googlescholar-adv.jpg
Abstract

Abstract at IgMin Research

Our mission is to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and accelerate the advancement of knowledge across a wide spectrum of scientific domains.

The use of FIKR (Facet, Insight, Knowledge, and Resilience) Personality as an Effective Assessment Tool to Select the Best Leadership in an Organization

Affiliation

Affiliation

    Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

    Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

    Humanology Sdn Bhd, 73-3 Amber Business Plaza, Jalan Jelawat 1, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Humanology Sdn Bhd, 73-3 Amber Business Plaza, Jalan Jelawat 1, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

This study presents a new assessment tool, FIKR (Facet, Insight, Knowledge, and Resilience) Personality Traits (PTs) for organisational talent development and leadership. The FIKR assessment tool offers a thorough framework for developing talent and leadership, covering facets, insights, knowledge, and resilience. By using these elements, individuals can enhance their ability to successfully and strategically guide and influence others. Gaining self-awareness of one’s strengths and shortcomings, harmonising personal values with objectives for developing talents, obtaining the requisite information and abilities, and cultivating resilience not only promotes personal progress but also cultivates the potential of people within the organisation. By embracing the interaction of these FIKR characteristics, one may adopt a comprehensive and influential approach to talent development and leadership.

Figures

References

    1. Blair CA, Palmieri RE, Paz-Aparicio C. Do Big 5 Personality Characteristics and Narcissism Predict Engagement in Leader Development? Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 28; 9:1817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01817. PMID: 30323781; PMCID: PMC6172568.
    2. Bonsteel S. APA PsycNET. The Charleston Advisor. 2012; 16-19(4). https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.14.1.16
    3. Cotterill ST, Fransen K. Leadership development in sports teams. 2021. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/680620/2/Full%20text%20Chapter%20Leadership%20Development.pdf
    4. Denison DR, Mishra AK. Towards a Theory of Organisational Culture and Effectiveness. Organisation Science. 1995; 6(2):204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
    5. Ensari N, Riggio RE, Christian J, Carslaw G. Who emerges as a leader? Meta-analyses of individual differences as predictors of leadership emergence. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011; 51(4):532–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.017
    6. Ho SL, Davern M, Tam KY. Personalisation and choice behaviour. ACM Sigmis Database. 2008; 39(4):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/1453794.1453800
    7. Hogan R, Kaiser RB. What do we know about leadership? Review of General Psychology. 2005; 9(2):169-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169
    8. John JM, Gropper H, Thiel A. The role of critical life events in the talent development pathways of athletes and musicians: A systematic review. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101565
    9. Jonason PK, Wee S, Li NP, Jackson CJ. Occupational niches and the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014; 69:119-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.024
    10. Jong ND, Wisse B, Heesink J, Zed KIVD. Personality Traits and Career Role Enactment: Career Role Preferences as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01720
    11. Judge TA, Cable DM. Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology. 1997; 50(2):359-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00912.x
    12. Kirkpatick SA, Locke EA. Leadership: do traits matter?.Academy of Management Perspectives. 1991; 5(2):48-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274679
    13. Klimstra TA, Luyckx K, Germeijs V, Meeus WH, Goossens L. Personality traits and educational identity formation in late adolescents: longitudinal associations and academic progress. J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Mar;41(3):346-61. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9734-7. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PMID: 22147120.
    14. Mount MK, Barrick MR. Five reasons why the “big five” article has been frequently cited: The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐ Personnel Psychology. 1998; 51(4):849-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00743.x
    15. Ng KY, Ang S, Chan KY. Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jul;93(4):733-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733. PMID: 18642980.
    16. Olszewski-Kubilius P, Kulieke MJ, Krasney N. Personality Dimensions of Gifted Adolescents: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Gifted Child Quarterly. 1988; 32(4):347–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200403
    17. Subotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. Environmental Factors and Personal Characteristics Interact to Yield High Performance in Domains. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 18; 10:2804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804. PMID: 31920847; PMCID: PMC6930243.
    18. Campbell L, Simpson JA, Stewart M, Manning J. Putting personality in social context: extraversion, emergent leadership, and the availability of rewards. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Dec;29(12):1547-59. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256920. PMID: 15018685.
    19. Felfe J, Schyns B. Personality and the Perception of Transformational Leadership: The Impact of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Personal Need for Structure, and Occupational Self-Efficacy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2006; 36(3):708-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x
    20. Moss S, Ritossa D, Ngu S. The effect of follower regulatory focus and extraversion on leadership behaviour: The role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences. 2006; 27(2):93-107. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.27.2.93
    21. Lemoine GJ, Aggarwal I, Steed LB. When women emerge as leaders: effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups. The Leadership Quarterly. 2016; 27(3):470-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.008
    22. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA. Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity, Academy of Management Journal. 2011; 54(3):528-550.
    23. Campbell L, Simpson JA, Stewart M, Manning J. Putting personality in social context: extraversion, emergent leadership, and the availability of rewards. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Dec;29(12):1547-59. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256920. PMID: 15018685.
    24. Felfe J, Schyns B. Personality and the Perception of Transformational Leadership: The Impact of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Personal Need for Structure, and Occupational Self-Efficacy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36(3):708-739.
    25. Moss S, Ritossa D, Ngu S. The effect of follower regulatory focus and extraversion on leadership behaviour: The role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences. 2006; 27(2):93-107.
    26. Lemoine GJ, Aggarwal I, Steed LB. When women emerge as leaders: effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups. The Leadership Quarterly. 2016; 27(3):470-486.
    27. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA. Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity, Academy of Management Journal. 2011; 54(3):528-550.
    28. Marinova SV, Moon H, Kamdar D. Getting ahead or getting along? The two-facet conceptualization of conscientiousness and leadership emerged. Organisation Science. 2013; 24(4):1257-1276.
    29. Boyce M, Sawang S. Unpacking the role of mindfulness in conscientiousness and spirituality. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. 2014; 10(6):6.
    30. Pak J, Chang H. Personal disposition as the source of variability in the HRM-performance relationship: the moderating effects of conscientiousness on the relationship between high-commitment work systems and employee outcomes The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2023; 34(20):3933-3962.
    31. Wang Y, Wu CH, Mobley WH. The two facets of conscientiousness are the interaction of achievement orientation and dependability in predicting managerial execution effectiveness. Human Performance. 2013; 26(4):275-296.
    32. Joo MK, Yu J, Atwater L. Goal-focused abusive leaders: The mitigating role of conscientiousness in subordinates’ counterproductive work behaviour Australian Journal of Management. 2023; 03128962231211174.
    33. Naqshbandi MM, Tabche I, Choudhary N. Managing open innovation: The roles of empowering leadership and employee involvement climate. Management Decision. 2019; 57(3):703-723.
    34. Herman HM, Mitchell RJ. A theoretical model of transformational leadership and knowledge creation: The role of open-mindedness norms and leader-member exchange. Journal of Management & Organisation. 2010; 16(1):83-99.
    35. Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Elliot, A. J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2017). Why schema violations are sometimes preferable to schema consistency: the role of interest and openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 54–69.
    36. Blake AB, Luu VH, Petrenko OV, Gardner WL, Moergen KJ, Ezerins ME. Let’s agree about nice leaders: A literature review and meta-analysis of agreeableness and its relationship with leadership outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly. 2022; 33(1):101593.
    37. Marjanović JZ, Krstić K, Rajić M, Ilić SI, Videnović M, Dimitrijević AA. The Big Five and Collaborative Problem Solving: A Narrative Systematic Review. European Journal of Personality. 2023; 08902070231198650.
    38. Nikookar H, Kashani SH, Norouzi Z, Zahedfar K, Nasseri S. The relationship between personality types and leadership styles in governmental organisations: Evidence from Iran. International Journal of Research in Organisational Behaviour and Human Resource Management. 2014; 2(3):179-192.
    39. Decuypere A, Audenaert M, Decramer A. When Mindfulness Interacts with Neuroticism to Enhance Transformational Leadership: The Role of Psychological Need Satisfaction. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18; 9:2588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02588. PMID: 30619000; PMCID: PMC6305618.
    40. Zhang K, Chen C, Tang N. When is a higher LMX comparison not always effective? The role of team-level LMX disparity and neuroticism. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology. 2023; 32(6):870-885.
    41. Shu CY, Lazatkhan J. The effect of leader-member exchange on employee envy and work behaviour is moderated by self-esteem and neuroticism. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. 2017; 33(1):69-81.
    42. Harms PD, Spain SM, Hannah ST. Leader development and the dark side of personality. The leadership quarterly. 2011; 22(3):495-509.
    43. Humanology Sdn Bhd. 2024. https://hba.com.my/
    44. Cattell RB, Eber HW, Tatsuoka MM. Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 1970.
    45. Cattell RB. Cattell AK, Cattell HEP. 16PF Fifth Edition Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 1993.
    46. Christiansen ND, Goffin RD, Johnston NG, Rothstein MG. Correcting for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions’, Personnel Psychology. 1994; 47(4):847-60.
    47. Conn SR, Rieke ML, Carson AD. The 16PF Fifth Edition Technical Manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. ‘The integration of interests, aptitudes and personality traits: A test of Lowman’s Matrix’, Journal of Career Assessment. 1994; 6(1):83-105.
    48. Guastello SJ, Rieke ML. The 16PF and Leadership: Summary of Research Findings 1954–1992. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 1993.
    49. Schuerger JM, Watterson DG. Occupational Interpretation of the 16PF Questionnaire. Cleveland, OH: Watterson and Associates. 1998.
    50. Watterson DG. The 16PF Leadership Coaching Report Manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 2002.
    51. Williams R, Champaign IL. 16PF5: Profiling Personality for Potential – A Data Supplement to the UK Edition. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 1999.
    52. Walter V. 16PF Personal Career Development Profile Technical and Interpretive Manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. 2000.
    53. Clark KE, Clark MB. Measures of Leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America. 1990.
    54. Dutta RD. Differences in personality factors of experienced teachers, physicians, bank managers, and fine artists’, Psychological Studies. 1995; 40(1):51-6.
    55. Roy DD. Differences in personality factors of experienced teachers, physicians, bank managers, and fine artists. Psychological Studies. 1995; 40:51-6.

Similar Articles

Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs) on Maize Stem Borer Infestation
Muhammad Salman Hameed, Khurshied Ahmed Khan, Nida Urooj and Ijaz Rasool Noorka
DOI10.61927/igmin147
Cyber Threat Analysis (CTA) in Current Conflicts
Zbigniew Ciekanowski and Sławomir Żurawski
DOI10.61927/igmin169
Solar Energy Resource Potentials of the City of Arkadag
Penjiyev Ahmet Myradovich and Orazov Parahat Orazmuhamedovich
DOI10.61927/igmin119