Editor guidelines at IgMin Research

Manuscript Handling Information

Efficient manuscript handling is the cornerstone of a successful scholarly journal. Editors hold the responsibility of overseeing the submission process, ensuring that manuscripts adhere to formatting guidelines, ethical considerations, and review criteria. Providing authors with clear instructions for manuscript preparation, including formatting styles, reference citation guidelines, and ethical considerations, helps streamline the submission process. Timely communication with authors about the status of their submissions, any required revisions, and the overall editorial process is crucial. Editors should also ensure that all submitted manuscripts are subjected to rigorous peer review to maintain the journal's quality and integrity.

Ensuring the efficient handling of manuscripts is a fundamental aspect of maintaining the quality and integrity of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. As an editor, your role in this process is crucial in guiding authors through submission, facilitating a transparent peer review, and maintaining effective communication.

Here's a detailed breakdown of the manuscript handling process:

1. Submission guidelines: Authors should be provided with clear and comprehensive submission guidelines. These guidelines should include instructions on manuscript formatting, reference citation styles, and ethical considerations. Clearly stipulate the preferred file formats for submission, the structure of the manuscript (such as title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, references, and supplementary materials), and any specific requirements unique to your journal.
2. Manuscript submission: Upon receiving a manuscript, ensure that it adheres to the provided guidelines. Check for completeness, proper formatting, and compliance with ethical standards. If any discrepancies or issues are identified, communicate them promptly to the authors and guide them on how to rectify the problems.
3. Initial screening: Conduct an initial assessment to ensure the manuscript falls within the journal's scope and adheres to the submission guidelines. Verify that the research aligns with the journal's multidisciplinary focus and has the potential to contribute meaningfully to STEM fields. Manuscripts that meet these criteria should proceed to the peer review stage, while those that do not align with the journal's mission should be respectfully declined.
4. Peer review assignment: Identify suitable peer reviewers who possess expertise in the manuscript's subject matter. Reviewers should be selected based on their knowledge, research experience, and lack of potential conflicts of interest. Aim for a diverse range of reviewers to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Provide reviewers with clear instructions, evaluation criteria, and a reasonable timeframe for completing the review.
5. Peer review process: Coordinate the peer review process by managing communication between authors and reviewers. Reviewers should assess the manuscript's originality, methodology, significance, clarity, and adherence to ethical standards. Consolidate feedback from reviewers and communicate their comments constructively to authors, facilitating the revision process.
6. Author revisions: Upon receiving feedback from reviewers, authors are expected to address the comments and make necessary revisions to improve the manuscript's quality. Guide authors on addressing specific reviewer concerns, ensuring transparency and adherence to the peer review process. Review revised manuscripts to verify that all concerns have been adequately addressed.
7. Editorial decision: Based on the feedback from reviewers and the revisions made by the authors, make an informed editorial decision. Possible decisions include acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. Provide authors with clear explanations for the decision and, if revisions are required, offer guidance on how to proceed.
8. Final acceptance and publication: Once a manuscript meets the journal's quality standards and all revisions have been successfully addressed, the manuscript can be accepted for publication. Communicate the final decision to authors and guide them through the publication process, which may involve formatting, proofreading, and copyright procedures.
9. Continuous communication: Throughout the manuscript handling process, maintain open and transparent communication with authors, reviewers, and any other stakeholders involved. Timely updates on the status of the manuscript, reviewer feedback, and editorial decisions foster a sense of trust and professionalism.

In summary, your role as an editor in manuscript handling is multi-faceted and requires careful attention to detail, effective communication, and adherence to ethical standards. By following these steps and collaborating with authors and reviewers, you contribute significantly to the journal's reputation for excellence and its mission of advancing multidisciplinary research within the STEM fields.

Guidance for New Editors

Welcoming new editors to the esteemed editorial team of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal marks the beginning of an exciting and enriching journey. As a new editor, you step into a role that not only shapes the journal's trajectory but also contributes significantly to the advancement of scientific knowledge within the multidisciplinary landscape of STEM. Here, we delve deeper into the intricacies of guiding new editors, providing you with a comprehensive roadmap to navigate your responsibilities and excel in your role:

Introduction to the journal's mission and scope

Embark on your editorial journey by immersing yourself in the heart of the journal's mission and scope. Recognize the journal's commitment to fostering cross-disciplinary exploration within the realm of STEM. A clear understanding of the journal's objectives, areas of focus, and the unique niche it occupies will serve as your compass throughout your tenure.

Orientation program

The cornerstone of your transition as a new editor lies in a well-structured orientation program. Engage wholeheartedly in this immersive experience, where you'll be introduced to the journal's core values, policies, and editorial guidelines. Through interactive sessions, workshops, and collaborative interactions with seasoned editors, you'll glean insights into proven strategies, challenges, and effective practices that form the bedrock of successful editorial stewardship.

Manuscript handling and peer review:

1. Initial manuscript assessment: Step into the role of the gatekeeper by meticulously evaluating incoming manuscripts. Beyond ensuring adherence to formatting standards and ethical considerations, grasp the essence of each submission. Consider its novelty, significance, and potential impact on the multidisciplinary landscape.
2. Assigning reviewers: Master the art of matching manuscripts with adept peer reviewers. Leverage your knowledge of the academic community to identify experts whose insights will enrich the review process. Prioritize diversity and impartiality in reviewer selection to ensure comprehensive evaluations.
3. Managing peer review process: Embrace your role as a facilitator of scholarly discourse. Shepherd the peer review process, facilitating constructive dialogues between authors and reviewers. Your adept communication skills will be instrumental in nurturing a productive exchange of ideas while preserving reviewer anonymity.
4. Editorial decision-making: Cultivate the ability to weigh reviewer feedback, assess manuscript quality, and align editorial decisions with the journal's standards. Embrace the responsibility of guiding manuscripts toward acceptance, revision, or rejection based on rigorous evaluation and objective judgment.

Ethical considerations

Infuse your editorial journey with a steadfast commitment to ethical integrity. Champion the principles of research ethics, plagiarism detection, authorship guidelines, and the disclosure of conflicts of interest. Your vigilance in upholding ethical standards will safeguard the journal's credibility and ensure the dissemination of reliable knowledge.

Communication

Elevate the editorial experience through transparent and timely communication. Forge enduring connections with authors, reviewers, and the editorial board by offering clear guidance, responsive updates, and constructive feedback. Your role as a liaison between stakeholders will foster an environment of mutual respect and collaboration.

Editorial board involvement

Participate actively in the symphony of collective editorial wisdom. Engage with fellow editorial board members, tapping into their diverse expertise and insights. Contribute to spirited discussions on evolving editorial policies, emerging research trends, and strategic initiatives that propel the journal's growth.

Continued learning

Nurture your intellectual curiosity and professional growth through continuous learning. Embark on a journey of self-improvement by attending workshops, conferences, and training sessions. Staying attuned to the dynamic landscape of scholarly publishing will empower you to steer the journal toward greater heights.

Journal development

Become an advocate for scholarly excellence by actively cultivating a culture of high-quality submissions. Forge alliances with prestigious conferences, academic institutions, and thought leaders to amplify the journal's reach. Explore avenues for commissioning articles that delve into cutting-edge interdisciplinary topics, thus enriching the journal's repertoire.

Marketing and promotion

Unleash your creativity in the realm of journal promotion. Harness the power of digital platforms, academic networks, and partnerships to elevate the journal's visibility. Elevate the journal's presence by showcasing groundbreaking articles, themed issues, and impactful research that resonate with a global audience.

Editorial leadership

Champion the ethos of inclusive editorial leadership by fostering an environment of camaraderie and mentorship. Extend a helping hand to fellow editors, especially those new to their roles, as they embark on their own journeys. Your guidance and support will contribute to a harmonious editorial collective that propels the journal forward.

Enhancing author engagement

Elevate the author experience by embracing a proactive approach. Cultivate a welcoming environment that encourages authors to submit their best work, underscored by the journal's reputation for excellence. Extend a guiding hand to authors, ensuring their journey through the submission and review process is smooth and rewarding.

As you embark on your role as a new editor for IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, remember that you are an integral part of a vibrant community dedicated to advancing knowledge and innovation. By adhering to these comprehensive guidelines and fostering meaningful collaborations, you will wield the torch of editorial stewardship, illuminating the path for impactful multidisciplinary research and fostering academic growth within the realm of STEM.

Compendium for Assessing a New Manuscript

Editors play a pivotal role in maintaining the journal's standards by evaluating submitted manuscripts. A thorough guide for assessing new manuscripts should encompass various aspects, such as evaluating the originality and significance of the research, the appropriateness of the methodology, the clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards. Clearly articulated evaluation criteria ensure consistency in the review process and contribute to maintaining the journal's reputation for scholarly excellence.

As an integral part of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, your role in evaluating and maintaining the quality of submitted manuscripts is of utmost importance. To ensure a consistent and thorough review process, we have developed a comprehensive guide for assessing new manuscripts. This guide outlines the key aspects and considerations involved in evaluating manuscripts, with the aim of upholding the journal's standards of excellence and contributing to the advancement of multidisciplinary research within the STEM fields.

Elaboration of the manuscript assessment process

1. Originality and significance:
   • Determine whether the research addresses a novel question, advances existing knowledge, or presents innovative approaches.
   • Assess the manuscript's potential impact on the field and its relevance to the journal's multidisciplinary scope.
2. Methodology and rigor:
   • Evaluate the research methodology, experimental design, and data analysis for clarity, validity, and appropriateness.
   • Ensure that the methods and techniques used are scientifically sound and well-described.
3. Clarity of presentation:
   • Review the clarity and organization of the manuscript's structure, ensuring it follows a logical flow from introduction to conclusion.
   • Assess the quality of writing, figures, and tables for effective communication of results.
4. Ethical considerations:
   • Verify that the research adheres to ethical guidelines and standards, including proper citation of sources, appropriate use of data, and adherence to authorship criteria.
   • Identify any potential conflicts of interest, plagiarism, or ethical concerns that need to be addressed.
5. Impactful contribution:
   • Determine whether the research contributes substantially to the advancement of knowledge in the respective field and adds value to the multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
   • Consider whether the findings have the potential to influence future research, applications, or policy.
6. Alignment with journal scope:
   • Ensure that the manuscript falls within the defined scope of the journal, covering diverse disciplines within STEM.
   • Evaluate whether the research bridges disciplinary boundaries and promotes interdisciplinary collaboration.
7. Peer review feedback:
   • Carefully review the feedback provided by peer reviewers, considering their comments on the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements.
   • Assess the author's response to reviewer comments and their incorporation of suggested revisions.
8. Balanced and impartial evaluation:
   • Approach the evaluation process with objectivity and fairness, avoiding personal biases or preconceived notions.
   • Provide constructive feedback that highlights both the manuscript's strengths and areas for improvement.
9. Consistency and transparency:
   • Ensure that the evaluation process adheres to consistent standards and criteria for all submitted manuscripts.
   • Maintain transparency by clearly communicating the rationale behind editorial decisions to authors.
10. Editorial decision:
    • Based on the assessment, decide whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.
    • Clearly communicate the decision to the authors, providing specific feedback and guidance for revisions if applicable.
      
      

Thank you for your commitment to excellence and your contribution to the success of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal.

Benchmarks for Finding Peer Reviewers

The selection of competent and impartial peer reviewers is a critical step in the editorial process. Editors should establish transparent criteria for identifying potential reviewers based on their expertise, prior experience, and potential conflicts of interest. Detailed instructions for reviewers regarding the review process, evaluation criteria, and expected turnaround time help ensure that the peer review process is constructive and timely.

Selecting competent and unbiased peer reviewers is a pivotal aspect of ensuring the scholarly rigor and quality of manuscripts submitted to IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. This process plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the journal and upholding its reputation within the academic community. Here is a detailed elaboration of the process involved in finding peer reviewers:

Step 1

Identification of potential reviewers:

• As an editor at IgMin Research, your first step in the peer reviewer selection process is to identify potential reviewers who possess expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject matter. This expertise could encompass the scientific discipline, research methodologies, and the specific topic of the manuscript.
• Consider utilizing various resources, such as academic databases, professional networks, and previous reviewers' databases, to identify potential candidates. Additionally, authors' reference lists and cited works can provide insights into potential reviewers.

Step 2

Expertise and experience evaluation:

• Once potential reviewers have been identified, thoroughly assess their expertise and experience in the field. Examine their publication history, research focus, and affiliations to gauge their suitability for reviewing the manuscript.
• Ensure that potential reviewers have a track record of contributing to reputable publications and possess a solid understanding of the subject matter. Aim for diversity in expertise to ensure a comprehensive review process.

Step 3

Avoiding conflicts of interest:

• Editors at IgMin Research must diligently avoid any potential conflicts of interest when selecting peer reviewers. Assess whether potential reviewers have any affiliations, collaborations, or personal relationships with the authors of the submitted manuscript.
• Conflicts of interest can undermine the objectivity and fairness of the review process. If any conflicts are identified, it is imperative to exclude those reviewers from consideration for that particular manuscript.

Step 4

Inviting reviewers:

• Once suitable reviewers have been identified, extend personalized invitations to them. Clearly outline the manuscript's title, abstract, and key objectives, along with a concise explanation of their expertise's relevance to the manuscript's subject matter.
• Provide a clear timeline for the review process, highlighting the expected turnaround time for their feedback. Emphasize the importance of their objective and constructive evaluation to maintain the journal's standards.

Step 5

Confirming reviewer availability:

• Upon receiving positive responses from potential reviewers, confirm their availability for the review process. Clarify any queries they may have about the manuscript, the review criteria, or the review process itself.
• If a reviewer declines or is unavailable, promptly revisit the list of potential reviewers and extend invitations to suitable alternatives.

Step 6

Monitoring the review process:

• Throughout the review process, editors play a crucial role in facilitating communication between authors and reviewers. Ensure that reviewers receive the manuscript promptly and adhere to the agreed-upon timeline for submission of their feedback.
• In the event of delayed responses or unforeseen circumstances, maintain open communication with both authors and reviewers to manage expectations and ensure a smooth review process.

Step 7

Reviewer feedback evaluation:

• Upon receiving feedback from reviewers, thoroughly evaluate their comments, suggestions, and critiques. Assess whether the feedback aligns with the journal's review criteria and editorial standards.
• Your objective evaluation of reviewer feedback serves as the basis for making informed editorial decisions regarding the manuscript's suitability for publication. Balance differing viewpoints and assess the overall contribution of the manuscript to the field.

Step 8

Decision and communication

• Based on the reviewer feedback, make a well-informed editorial decision regarding the manuscript. Communicate this decision to the authors in a clear, transparent, and timely manner. Include constructive feedback from reviewers to guide authors in improving their work, whether it is accepted, requires revisions, or is declined.

Step 9

Acknowledging reviewer contributions:

• Recognize and acknowledge the valuable contributions of peer reviewers to the journal's review process. Timely communication, expression of gratitude, and recognition of their efforts contribute to fostering a collaborative and supportive reviewer community.

By meticulously following these steps in the peer reviewer selection process, you, as an editor at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, ensure a fair, rigorous, and transparent review process that upholds the journal's commitment to scholarly excellence and multidisciplinary advancement within the STEM fields.

How to Make an Editorial Decision

Editorial decisions significantly impact the journal's credibility and reputation. Editors should carefully consider the feedback provided by peer reviewers, the quality and relevance of the manuscript, and its alignment with the journal's scope when making decisions. Transparent and timely communication of decisions, along with constructive feedback to authors, fosters an atmosphere of respect and professionalism.

Making editorial decisions is a pivotal responsibility that significantly influences the quality and reputation of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. This process involves a careful and objective evaluation of submitted manuscripts to determine their suitability for publication. Here is a point-by-point elaboration of the steps involved in making an informed editorial decision:

Step 1

Manuscript evaluation:

• Upon receiving a manuscript, the assigned editor conducts an initial assessment to ensure it aligns with the journal's scope and submission guidelines. This preliminary review helps filter out submissions that are not suitable for further consideration.

Step 2

Peer review assignment:

• If the manuscript passes the initial assessment, the editor identifies suitable peer reviewers with expertise in the manuscript's subject area. The reviewers are selected based on their knowledge, research experience, and absence of conflicts of interest.

Step 3

Peer review process:

• The manuscript is sent to the selected peer reviewers for a comprehensive evaluation. Reviewers assess the manuscript's originality, methodology, significance, clarity, and adherence to ethical standards. They provide detailed comments and recommendations to the editor.

Step 4

Reviewer recommendations:

• After receiving feedback from the peer reviewers, the editor reviews their comments and recommendations. The editor considers the reviewers' assessments of the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and overall quality.

Step 5

Editor's assessment:

• Drawing from the reviewers' feedback, the editor conducts an independent assessment of the manuscript. The editor evaluates the quality of the research, the rigor of the methodology, the clarity of presentation, and the alignment with the journal's scope and objectives.

Step 6

Decision making:

• Based on the collective feedback from the peer reviewers and the editor's assessment, an editorial decision is made. The decision options typically include:

1. 1. Accept: Manuscript is accepted for publication without major revisions.
   2. Minor revisions: Manuscript requires minor revisions that can be assessed by the editor.
   3. Major revisions: Manuscript requires significant revisions, which will be re-evaluated by peer reviewers.
   4. Reject: Manuscript does not meet the journal's standards for publication.

Step 7

Decision communication:

• The editor communicates the decision to the authors, providing clear and constructive feedback. If revisions are required, specific suggestions are given to guide the authors in improving their manuscript.

Step 8

Revisions and resubmission;

• Authors revise the manuscript based on the editor's and reviewers' feedback. Revisions should address all the concerns raised during the review process. Authors may also include a detailed response to each reviewer's comment.

Step 9

Re-evaluation and final decision;

• The revised manuscript is re-evaluated by the editor and, if necessary, by the original peer reviewers. The editor ensures that all concerns have been adequately addressed before making a final decision.

Step 10

Acceptance and publication:

• Once the editor is satisfied with the revisions and the manuscript meets the journal's standards, it is accepted for publication. The manuscript is then prepared for publication, including copyediting, typesetting, and layout design.

Step 11

Post-acceptance communication:

• The editor communicates the final acceptance of the manuscript to the authors. Authors are provided with information about the publication schedule, proofreading process, and any additional requirements.

In summary, the editorial decision-making process at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal involves a systematic and objective evaluation of manuscripts, guided by peer review feedback, the editor's assessment, and adherence to the journal's scope and standards. Clear and constructive communication with authors ensures transparency and maintains the journal's reputation for scholarly excellence. By following these steps diligently, the editorial team contributes to advancing multidisciplinary research within the STEM fields and upholding the journal's credibility.

Editorial Policies

Clearly defined editorial policies form the backbone of a reputable journal. Editors are responsible for enforcing these policies, which cover various aspects such as ethical considerations, conflicts of interest, data integrity, plagiarism, and authorship guidelines. Regular updates to editorial policies based on evolving ethical standards and scientific practices ensure the journal's continued relevance and adherence to best practices.

At IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, our commitment to upholding the highest standards of scholarly publishing is reflected in our well-defined and meticulously crafted editorial policies. These policies are designed to ensure transparency, integrity, and ethical conduct throughout the publication process. As an editor, understanding and enforcing these policies are paramount to maintaining the credibility and reputation of the journal. Here, we provide a detailed elaboration of our editorial policies, guiding you through the process step by step:

1. Ethical considerations: Ethical considerations form the bedrock of our journal's editorial policies. As an editor, you are expected to ensure that submitted manuscripts adhere to ethical standards and guidelines. This includes confirming the originality of the work, addressing issues of plagiarism or duplicate submission, and ensuring that proper credit is given to authors, contributors, and sources. In cases involving potential ethical violations, you will play a key role in conducting investigations and taking appropriate actions in consultation with the editorial board.
2. Conflicts of interest: Identifying and managing conflicts of interest is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the peer review and publication process. You will be responsible for assessing potential conflicts of interest among authors, reviewers, and editorial board members. Should conflicts arise, you will work to ensure unbiased and impartial evaluations by reassigning manuscripts or reviewers as needed.
3. Data integrity and reproducibility: Preserving the integrity of scientific research is a fundamental aspect of our journal's policies. You will be tasked with scrutinizing submitted manuscripts to ensure that the data, methods, and results are accurately presented. Encouraging authors to provide comprehensive descriptions of their methodologies and facilitating data sharing will contribute to the advancement of reproducible research within the STEM fields.
4. Authorship guidelines: Clear and transparent authorship criteria help prevent issues related to authorship disputes and ensure proper recognition for contributors. You will evaluate the contributions of each author and ensure that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. Addressing authorship concerns promptly and fairly will maintain the journal's commitment to scholarly collaboration.
5. Peer review process: The peer review process is the cornerstone of scholarly evaluation. As an editor, you will oversee the selection of peer reviewers, ensuring their expertise aligns with the manuscript's subject matter. Managing the peer review timeline, gathering reviewer feedback, and making informed editorial decisions based on reviewer comments will guide the manuscript towards publication or revisions.
6. Editorial decision-making: Making editorial decisions requires careful consideration of reviewer feedback, manuscript quality, and alignment with the journal's scope. You will assess reviewer comments, weigh the significance of the research, and ensure that the decision-making process remains transparent and consistent. Constructive feedback to authors, regardless of the decision, promotes a respectful and collaborative publishing environment.
7. Corrections and retractions: In instances where errors or issues in published articles come to light, you will be responsible for addressing these matters transparently and promptly. Implementing corrections, errata, or retractions when necessary, in accordance with established guidelines, ensures the accuracy and credibility of the journal's content.
8. Open access and licensing: Our commitment to open access and knowledge dissemination necessitates an understanding of licensing agreements and copyright policies. You will work with authors to ensure compliance with licensing requirements, facilitating the accessibility and sharing of research outcomes within the academic community and beyond.
9. Diversity and inclusion: Promoting diversity and inclusion is central to our journal's values. You will actively seek to ensure diverse representation among authors, reviewers, and editorial board members. Fostering an inclusive environment encourages a wider range of perspectives and enriches the quality of published content.
10. Continuous improvement and updates: Editorial policies are not static; they evolve to reflect the changing landscape of scholarly publishing. You will collaborate with the editorial board to regularly review and update policies in response to emerging ethical standards, technological advancements, and best practices within the publishing industry.

By adhering to these detailed editorial policies, you play a pivotal role in upholding the journal's integrity, promoting ethical conduct, and contributing to the advancement of multidisciplinary research in STEM fields. Your dedication to these principles ensures that IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal continues to serve as a trusted platform for disseminating innovative and impactful scientific knowledge.

Assistance to Editors in Attracting High-Quality Submissions

Editors hold a vital role in attracting high-quality submissions that align with the journal's scope and mission. Collaborating with professional societies, academic conferences, and researchers can help promote the journal's profile and enhance its reach. By highlighting the journal's reputation for publishing impactful research, editors can motivate authors to submit their best work, thus contributing to the journal's success.

As an editor, your engagement in this process is crucial to enhancing the journal's impact and reputation. Here's a detailed guide outlining the steps and strategies involved in effectively attracting and selecting exceptional research submissions:

Step 1

Define the journal's scope and focus

Understand the journal's scope, mission, and specific areas of interest within STEM disciplines. This clarity will enable you to target researchers, practitioners, and scholars whose work aligns with the journal's goals.

Step 2

Collaborate with professional societies and conferences

Forge partnerships with reputable professional societies, academic conferences, and research institutions. Collaborative efforts can lead to increased visibility and recognition within the STEM community. Attend conferences, present the journal's objectives, and network with potential authors to encourage them to consider IgMin Research for publication.

Step 3

Engage with researchers and academics

Actively engage with researchers and academics through online forums, academic networks, and social media platforms. Share the journal's recent articles, updates, and calls for submissions to foster awareness and interest.

Step 4

Highlight the journal's reputation

Emphasize the journal's track record of publishing high-impact research and its commitment to promoting multidisciplinary collaboration. Researchers are more likely to submit their work to journals with a strong reputation for excellence.

Step 5

Call for special issues and thematic sections

Encourage the creation of special issues or thematic sections within the journal. Collaborate with experts in specific subfields to curate focused collections of research articles. These special issues attract authors with specialized knowledge and contribute to the journal's diversity and depth.

Step 6

Foster author-friendly policies

Implement author-friendly policies, such as streamlined submission processes, clear guidelines, and efficient peer review timelines. A positive author experience encourages researchers to consider IgMin Research as their preferred outlet for sharing their work.

Step 7

Spotlight early-career researchers

Recognize and showcase the work of early-career researchers by featuring their articles or profiles in the journal. This approach not only supports emerging talent but also attracts a younger demographic of authors.

Step 8

Collaborate with institutional repositories

Engage with universities and research institutions to promote the journal as a valuable platform for sharing research outcomes. Collaborating with institutional repositories can facilitate wider dissemination and increase submissions from academics.

Step 9

Encourage cross-disciplinary submissions

Promote interdisciplinary collaboration by actively encouraging authors to submit research that spans multiple STEM disciplines. Cross-disciplinary submissions enrich the journal's content and provide readers with comprehensive insights.

Step 10

Leverage social media and online presence

Utilize social media platforms, academic networks, and the journal's website to share impactful articles, highlight authors' achievements, and engage with the academic community. Regularly update these channels to maintain an active online presence.

Step 11

Provide author support and resources

Offer resources, such as author guidelines, writing workshops, and submission tutorials, to assist potential authors in preparing their submissions. Clear communication about the submission process and expectations can help authors navigate the publishing journey effectively.

Step 12

Recognize and celebrate excellence

Acknowledge and celebrate outstanding contributions through awards, recognition, and featured articles. Recognizing exceptional research and authors encourages others to strive for excellence and contributes to the journal's reputation.

By following these steps and adopting a proactive approach, you, as an editor at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, can significantly contribute to the journal's growth and impact. Your dedication to attracting high-quality submissions and fostering multidisciplinary collaboration is instrumental in advancing scientific knowledge and innovation within the STEM fields.

A Guide to Commissioning Articles

Commissioning articles on emerging topics or interdisciplinary themes can broaden the journal's appeal and impact. Editors should identify experts in specific fields and invite them to contribute articles that push the boundaries of research and innovation. These commissioned articles should undergo the same rigorous peer review process as regular submissions, ensuring their scholarly rigor and relevance.

Here's a detailed elaboration of the process involved in commissioning articles for our journal:

Step 1

Identifying emerging topics and experts

Commissioning begins with the identification of emerging research topics and areas of significance within the STEM fields. The editorial team collaborates to identify subject areas that align with the journal's scope and would be of interest to the readership. This involves staying updated on the latest advancements, attending conferences, and engaging with experts in the field.

Step 2

Defining the article scope and focus

Once a potential topic is identified, the editorial team defines the scope and focus of the commissioned article. This involves clarifying the specific research questions or themes that the article should address. The aim is to ensure that the commissioned article contributes original insights and aligns with the journal's mission.

Step 3

Identifying and inviting experts

The editorial team identifies leading experts who have demonstrated expertise in the chosen topic. These experts could be established researchers, practitioners, or thought leaders in the field. Invitations are extended to these individuals to contribute an article based on their expertise and insights.

Step 4

Communicating expectations and guidelines

Once an expert agrees to contribute, clear communication is established regarding the expectations, guidelines, and timeline for the commissioned article. Editors provide detailed instructions on formatting, citation styles, word count, and any specific requirements unique to the journal. This ensures a standardized and consistent approach to manuscript preparation.

Step 5

Manuscript submission and review

The commissioned author submits the manuscript following the provided guidelines. The submission undergoes the same rigorous peer review process as regular submissions to ensure the quality, accuracy, and validity of the content. Reviewers evaluate the article's significance, methodology, originality, and contribution to the field.

Step 6

Author revisions and editing

Based on the peer reviewers' feedback, the commissioned author may be required to revise and refine the manuscript. Editors facilitate the revision process, ensuring that the article meets the journal's standards and maintains a high level of scholarly rigor. Language and style editing may also be conducted at this stage.

Step 7

Peer review reassessment and final secision

The revised manuscript undergoes a second round of peer review to assess the adequacy of revisions and ensure that all concerns raised by reviewers have been adequately addressed. Based on the feedback from the second round of reviews, the editorial team makes a final decision regarding the acceptance, revision, or rejection of the commissioned article.

Step 8

Production and publication

Once the commissioned article is accepted, it enters the production phase, where it undergoes final formatting, proofreading, and preparation for publication. Upon completion of the production process, the article is published in the journal's regular issues or as part of a special thematic section, depending on the editorial strategy.

Step 9

Promoting the commissioned article

After publication, the editorial team collaborates with the author to promote the commissioned article. This involves creating press releases, social media posts, and other promotional materials to highlight the article's significance, impact, and relevance to the broader scientific community.

Step 10

Monitoring impact and engagement

Editors monitor the impact of the commissioned article through citation metrics, download statistics, and engagement metrics. Tracking the article's influence helps assess its contribution to the journal's reputation and its role in advancing knowledge within the chosen subject area.

By following this comprehensive process, IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal can successfully commission articles that offer valuable insights, foster interdisciplinary dialogue, and contribute to the journal's overall mission of promoting multidisciplinary research excellence within the STEM fields.

Marketing Initiatives in Promoting Your Journal

Effectively marketing the journal is essential for increasing its visibility and readership. Editors can leverage various marketing strategies, including social media campaigns, collaboration with academic networks, and partnerships with science communication platforms. By regularly sharing noteworthy articles, special issues, and updates about the journal, editors can engage a wider audience and strengthen the journal's presence in the academic community.

At IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, effective marketing initiatives play a pivotal role in increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of the journal. By strategically leveraging various marketing strategies, editors can actively engage with the academic community and beyond, ensuring that the journal's contributions reach a broader audience. Here's a detailed elaboration of the process involved in using marketing initiatives to promote the journal:

1. Define your audience: Identify your target audience, including researchers, academics, professionals, students, and institutions interested in multidisciplinary STEM research. Understanding their needs and preferences will guide your marketing efforts and tailor your messages effectively.
2. Develop a comprehensive marketing plan: Create a well-structured marketing plan that outlines your goals, strategies, tactics, and metrics for success. Determine key milestones and allocate resources, such as budget and personnel, to each initiative. A thoughtfully crafted plan ensures a systematic approach to promoting the journal.
3. Leverage social media platforms: Utilize popular social media platforms such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram to share engaging content related to the journal. Regularly post updates about newly published articles, special issues, and journal developments. Engage with your followers by responding to comments, sharing relevant content from other sources, and participating in relevant conversations.
4. Engage with academic networks: Collaborate with academic societies, research institutions, and relevant conferences to establish a strong presence within the academic community. Participate in conferences, workshops, and seminars to showcase the journal's mission and objectives. Networking opportunities can lead to partnerships and collaborations that enhance the journal's visibility.
5. Partner with science communication platforms: Form partnerships with science communication platforms, such as science news websites, podcasts, and YouTube channels. These collaborations provide opportunities to feature key research findings, interviews with authors, and discussions on emerging trends. The wider exposure gained through such partnerships can attract a diverse readership.
6. Create engaging multimedia content: Produce visually appealing and informative multimedia content, such as infographics, videos, and animations, that highlight the significance of published articles. These materials can simplify complex research concepts and make them accessible to a broader audience, increasing engagement and shareability.
7. Develop a journal website: Maintain a user-friendly and informative journal website that serves as a central hub for all journal-related information. Include sections for current and past issues, author guidelines, editorial board profiles, and calls for papers. A well-designed website enhances the journal's professionalism and accessibility.
8. Implement email marketing campaigns: Utilize email marketing to regularly communicate with subscribers, authors, reviewers, and readers. Send out newsletters featuring recent articles, special issues, and journal updates. Tailor your email content to provide value to your audience, keeping them informed and engaged.
9. Highlight special issues and themes: Promote special issues and thematic collections through targeted marketing efforts. Showcase the significance of these curated collections and their relevance to current research trends. Engage with researchers and institutions specialized in the respective themes to expand the reach of these issues.
10. Encourage author engagement: Encourage authors to actively participate in promoting their published articles through their own networks and social media platforms. Provide authors with shareable materials, such as visual abstracts and key findings, to facilitate their engagement in disseminating their research.
11. Monitor and evaluate performance: Regularly track and analyze the effectiveness of your marketing initiatives. Monitor key metrics such as website traffic, social media engagement, email open rates, and article downloads. Use these insights to refine your strategies and make informed decisions for future campaigns.
12. Foster continuous improvement: Based on your performance analysis, continuously refine and adapt your marketing strategies to align with changing trends and audience preferences. Stay attuned to emerging platforms and technologies to ensure that your promotional efforts remain innovative and impactful.

By implementing these comprehensive marketing initiatives, IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal aims to enhance its visibility, engage a diverse audience, and contribute to the advancement of multidisciplinary research within the STEM fields. Editors play a crucial role in driving these efforts and ensuring that the journal's contributions reach a global audience of researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts.

Advice on Showcasing Different Studies

Promoting published articles enhances their visibility and impact. Editors can collaborate with authors to create engaging press releases, social media posts, and multimedia content that highlight the significance of published studies. Sharing articles through multiple channels and engaging in strategic collaborations can amplify the reach of the research and contribute to the journal's reputation as a platform for groundbreaking discoveries.

Here's a detailed elaboration of the process involved in showcasing different studies and increasing their visibility through article promotion:

1. Identifying key articles: The first step is to identify articles that have the potential to make a significant impact in their respective fields. Collaborate with the editorial team and reviewers to pinpoint articles with groundbreaking findings, innovative methodologies, or profound implications.
2. Creating engaging content: Craft compelling and accessible content that highlights the key findings, implications, and relevance of the selected articles. This content can take various forms, including press releases, blog posts, social media updates, and multimedia presentations.
3. Collaborating with authors: Engage authors in the promotion process by seeking their input and perspective on the promotional content. Authors' insights can enrich the promotional materials and enhance the accuracy of the messaging.
4. Crafting press releases: Develop well-written press releases that encapsulate the essence of the research findings in a succinct and attention-grabbing manner. Press releases should emphasize the real-world implications and significance of the research, making them appealing to journalists, bloggers, and media outlets.
5. Leveraging social media: Harness the power of social media platforms to reach a broader audience. Craft engaging posts that encapsulate the research's main points and include eye-catching visuals. Encourage authors, reviewers, and readers to share the posts to amplify the reach.
6. Collaborating with science communicators: Establish partnerships with science communication platforms, journalists, and science writers who specialize in translating complex research into accessible content. Their expertise can help disseminate the research to a wider non-academic audience.
7. Engaging with academic networks: Leverage academic networks, conferences, and seminars to present and discuss the featured research. Presenting findings to peers and researchers in related fields can spark fruitful discussions and further dissemination.
8. Designing multimedia content: Enhance engagement by creating multimedia content such as videos, infographics, and podcasts that visually convey the research findings. Multimedia content is easily shareable and appeals to diverse learning preferences.
9. Hosting webinars and workshops: Organize webinars and workshops that delve deeper into the featured research. This interactive approach allows for direct engagement with authors, encouraging questions, discussions, and a deeper understanding of the study's nuances.
10. Encouraging reader interaction: Prompt readers to engage with the promotional content by including thought-provoking questions, discussion points, or calls to action. Encouraging comments, shares, and discussions can foster a sense of community around the research.
11. Monitoring and measuring impact: Utilize analytics tools to track the impact of the promotional efforts. Monitor metrics such as website traffic, social media engagement, media coverage, and citations to assess the effectiveness of the promotion.
12. Continuous improvement: Regularly assess the success of different promotion strategies and adapt based on the outcomes. Experiment with various approaches to identify the most effective methods for reaching the target audience.

By meticulously implementing these steps, IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal can effectively showcase diverse studies and increase their visibility to a wider audience. Effective article promotion not only elevates the journal's profile but also facilitates the dissemination of impactful research, fostering a culture of knowledge sharing and scientific advancement.

Advice on Developing and Maintaining

A well-structured and diverse editorial board is a cornerstone of successful journal management. Editors should actively seek experts from various disciplines, geographic regions, and demographic backgrounds to join the board. Regular communication, training, and recognition of editorial board members foster a sense of belonging and mutual support, enhancing the overall editorial process and the journal's standing in the academic community.

Maintaining a robust and diverse editorial board is paramount to the success of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. An effective editorial board not only upholds the journal's scholarly standards but also enhances its reputation, credibility, and outreach within the academic community. Here's a detailed guide on how to develop and maintain your editorial board:

1. Identify expertise and diversity: Begin by identifying individuals with expertise across various STEM disciplines relevant to the journal's scope. Aim for diversity in terms of research areas, geographic locations, gender, and demographic backgrounds. This diversity enriches the board's perspectives and ensures a comprehensive review process.
2. Invite potential board members: Reach out to potential editorial board members with a clear and personalized invitation. Highlight the journal's mission, scope, and the value they can bring to the board. Emphasize their role in shaping the journal's direction and contributing to the advancement of multidisciplinary research.
3. Review and selection: Once responses are received, evaluate each potential board member's qualifications, publication record, and experience in peer review. Consider their commitment to ethical standards, responsiveness, and their ability to provide constructive feedback. Select those who align with the journal's vision and demonstrate a strong dedication to scholarly excellence.
4. Onboarding and orientation: New board members should undergo a comprehensive onboarding process. Provide them with an orientation packet that includes information about the journal's policies, peer review guidelines, ethical considerations, and the editorial workflow. This ensures that all board members are aligned with the journal's expectations and standards.
5. Regular communication: Maintain open and regular communication with board members. Foster a sense of community by sharing updates, highlighting exceptional contributions, and facilitating discussions on emerging trends and challenges in the field. Encourage active engagement through virtual meetings, webinars, and workshops.
6. Training and development: Offer opportunities for board members to enhance their peer review and editorial skills. Provide training sessions on topics such as effective feedback, conflict resolution, and ethical considerations. Encourage participation in relevant workshops and conferences to stay updated on best practices.
7. Recognition and appreciation: Acknowledge the valuable contributions of board members through recognition in journal publications, the journal's website, and annual reports. Express gratitude for their dedication to maintaining the journal's quality and advancing multidisciplinary research.
8. Term renewals and rotations: Establish term limits for editorial board members to ensure a dynamic and evolving board. Consider staggered term lengths to maintain continuity while allowing for new voices and perspectives. Provide opportunities for board members to renew their terms based on their contributions and availability.
9. Feedback and assessment: Regularly solicit feedback from editorial board members on the journal's processes, policies, and overall functioning. Use this feedback to make informed improvements and adaptations. Conduct periodic assessments to evaluate the board's effectiveness in meeting the journal's goals.
10. Collaboration and networking: Encourage collaborative initiatives among board members, such as co-editing special issues, organizing conferences, or contributing to opinion pieces. Facilitate networking opportunities that enable board members to connect with each other and other experts in the field.
11. Embrace innovation: Stay open to innovative approaches and technologies that can enhance the editorial process. Explore tools and platforms that streamline manuscript handling, peer review, and communication among board members.
12. Continuously evolve: As the journal evolves and adapts to changing trends and research landscapes, the editorial board should evolve as well. Regularly assess the board's composition and effectiveness to ensure it remains aligned with the journal's mission and goals.

By carefully developing and maintaining your editorial board according to these guidelines, IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal can create a collaborative and dynamic environment that promotes the highest standards of scholarly publishing, advances multidisciplinary research, and contributes to the progress of STEM fields on a global scale. Your dedicated editorial board members play a vital role in shaping the journal's trajectory and ensuring its lasting impact within the academic community.

Developments or Findings Through Blogs

Blogging provides editors with an informal platform to communicate interesting developments, trends, and recent findings in the field. Editors can contribute thought-provoking blogs or collaborate with subject-matter experts to create engaging content that contextualizes recent research, addresses controversies, and sparks meaningful scientific discussions. By regularly sharing informative and engaging blogs, editors can enhance the journal's online presence, attract a wider readership, and contribute to the advancement of multidisciplinary knowledge.

In today's digital age, effective science communication plays a pivotal role in engaging a broader audience and fostering meaningful discussions around research developments. As an Editor at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, you have the opportunity to utilize blogs as a valuable tool to communicate interesting findings, trends, and insights within the multidisciplinary STEM landscape. Here's a point-by-point elaboration of the process involved in effectively communicating through blogs:

1. Identify compelling topics: Begin by identifying topics that resonate with your journal's readership and align with its multidisciplinary focus. Consider recent breakthroughs, emerging trends, controversies, or areas where interdisciplinary collaboration is taking place. Your aim is to capture readers' attention and provide them with fresh perspectives.
2. Craft engaging content: Once you've chosen a topic, craft well-researched and thought-provoking content. Break down complex concepts into accessible language, ensuring that your content is informative, engaging, and easy to understand for both experts and non-experts in the field.
3. Provide context and relevance: Contextualize the topic within the broader scientific landscape. Explain why the development or finding is significant and how it contributes to advancing knowledge or addressing real-world challenges. Readers should understand the relevance and potential impact of the discussed research.
4. Source credible information: Ensure that the information you provide is accurate and supported by reputable sources. Include references, citations, and links to relevant studies or publications to substantiate your claims and allow readers to explore further.
5. Encourage dialogue: Blogs offer a platform for interaction and dialogue. Encourage readers to share their thoughts, questions, and insights in the comments section. Engage with readers by responding to their comments and fostering a constructive and open discussion.
6. Collaborate with experts: Consider collaborating with researchers, authors, or experts who have contributed to the journal. Their insights can add depth and credibility to your blog posts. Collaborative posts also help in showcasing the collaborative nature of your journal.
7. Use visuals wisely: Incorporate visuals such as images, graphs, and diagrams to enhance the visual appeal of your blog and aid in explaining complex concepts. Visuals can make the content more engaging and accessible.
8. Promote across channels: Maximize the reach of your blogs by promoting them across various channels. Share them on the journal's website, social media platforms, newsletters, and academic networks. This wider distribution ensures that your content reaches a diverse and engaged audience.
9. Consistency and frequency: Maintain a consistent schedule for publishing blogs. Regular, timely updates keep readers engaged and build anticipation. Aim for a balance between quality and frequency to ensure that each blog post adds value to your audience.
10. Monitor and evaluate: Track the performance of your blog posts by analyzing metrics such as views, engagement, comments, and social media shares. This feedback helps you understand what resonates with your audience and refine your content strategy accordingly.
11. Explore various formats: Experiment with different formats to keep your content fresh and engaging. Consider interviews with researchers, round-up posts highlighting recent research in multiple disciplines, or opinion pieces on relevant issues.
12. Showcase multidisciplinary connections: Leverage the opportunity to highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the research published in your journal. Showcase how different STEM disciplines intersect and collaborate to solve complex problems.

By effectively utilizing blogs, you can extend the impact of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal beyond traditional scholarly publishing. Engaging and informative blog content not only enhances the visibility of the journal but also contributes to the dissemination of multidisciplinary knowledge, fostering a vibrant community of researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts who are passionate about advancing STEM research.

As IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal embarks on its journey, these expanded guidelines serve as a comprehensive framework to guide editors in their roles and responsibilities. By upholding these principles, editors contribute to the journal's reputation, foster high-quality research submissions, and facilitate the dissemination of impactful multidisciplinary research within the STEM fields.