googlescholar-adv.jpg
Crossmark policy

Crossmark policy at IgMin Research

Our mission is to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and accelerate the advancement of knowledge across a wide spectrum of scientific domains.

Introduction to CrossMark

The CrossMark Policy of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal is a crucial aspect of our commitment to upholding the highest standards of academic publishing. In an era where the volume of scholarly articles is constantly increasing, and the rapid pace of scientific discovery necessitates ongoing updates, it is essential to ensure the accuracy and reliability of published research. The CrossMark system, administered by CrossRef, plays a vital role in achieving this objective by providing a clear and standardized means to track changes and updates to scholarly articles.

CrossMark is a revolutionary digital identification system that serves as a hallmark of reliability and transparency in scholarly publishing. Developed by CrossRef, a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing research communication, CrossMark was introduced in 2012 to address the challenges posed by the increasing volume of academic literature and the dynamic nature of scientific discoveries. It offers a standardized and user-friendly solution to track and communicate updates, corrections, and retractions to published articles, ensuring that researchers and readers have access to the most current and accurate versions of scholarly works.

Elaboration

  1. Creation of a unique identifier: The CrossMark process begins when an author submits a manuscript to IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. Upon acceptance for publication, the article receives a unique digital identifier, known as a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), from CrossRef. This DOI serves as the foundation for the CrossMark system and becomes an integral part of the scholarly article's identity.
  2. Embedding the CrossMark logo: To signify their commitment to transparent and accountable publishing, authors are encouraged to incorporate the CrossMark logo within their manuscripts before submission. The logo, displayed prominently on the first page of the published article, immediately informs readers that the work is part of the CrossMark system.
  3. Verification by editorial team: Upon receiving the manuscript, the editorial team at IgMin Research conducts a thorough review of the submitted CrossMark information. This verification process ensures that the provided data is accurate, up-to-date, and appropriately categorizes any potential changes that might occur to the article after publication.
  4. Article publication and linking: Once the manuscript successfully completes the peer-review process and is accepted for publication, the CrossMark logo is officially added to the article's first page. At this stage, the DOI and the CrossMark logo become intrinsically linked, and readers can access the most recent version of the article by clicking on the logo.
  5. Dynamic and persistent linking: The beauty of the CrossMark system lies in its dynamic and persistent linking capabilities. Regardless of where the article is hosted, the CrossMark logo leads readers to the official version on the IgMin Research website. This persistent linking ensures that readers always have access to the latest updates, corrections, or retractions associated with the article, irrespective of any potential changes to its location.
  6. Monitoring and updating: The responsibility of maintaining the accuracy and relevance of the CrossMark information lies with both the authors and the editorial team. Authors are required to promptly notify IgMin Research of any changes to their published articles, while the editorial team verifies the updates before implementing them. This ongoing monitoring and updating process guarantee that readers are directed to the most current and reliable version of the article.
  7. Retraction and resolution: In cases where an article requires retraction due to ethical concerns, scientific misconduct, or significant errors, the CrossMark logo plays a critical role in communicating this status to readers. By clicking on the logo, readers will be directed to an explanation or retraction statement, ensuring that they are informed about the article's status and the reasons behind the retraction.
  8. Reader engagement: For readers, the CrossMark system provides a valuable means of engagement with published research. By clicking on the CrossMark logo, readers can proactively check for any updates or corrections that might impact their understanding of the research. This engagement fosters a culture of continuous improvement and strengthens the credibility of scholarly communication.

In conclusion, the introduction of CrossMark to IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal represents a significant step towards enhancing the transparency, reliability, and accessibility of scholarly articles. The dynamic and persistent linking capabilities of CrossMark ensure that readers can access the most current and reliable versions of published research, facilitating a more informed and robust academic discourse. By incorporating CrossMark into our publication process, we reaffirm our commitment to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and promoting responsible and accountable scholarly publishing.

Introduction to CrossMark

At IgMin Research - STEM, we actively encourage authors to incorporate the CrossMark logo within their submitted manuscripts. This step is essential in ensuring that our published articles are equipped with a standardized and recognizable indicator of their status and integrity. The CrossMark logo serves as a dynamic link between the published article and any future updates or corrections, allowing readers to access the most current and reliable version of the research.

The process involved in using CrossMark at IgMin Research involves the following key points:

  1. Author submission: Upon submission of their manuscripts, authors are requested to include the CrossMark logo as a part of their article. This logo should be placed on the first page of the manuscript, making it easily accessible to readers. The CrossMark logo acts as a visual cue, indicating the article's connection to the CrossMark system and its status as a scholarly work with ongoing monitoring.
  2. Editorial review: Once a manuscript is submitted to IgMin Research - STEM, it undergoes a thorough peer review process. During this review, the editorial team assesses the content of the article for scientific rigor, ethical compliance, and adherence to the journal's guidelines. Additionally, the editorial team also verifies the accuracy and appropriateness of the CrossMark information provided by the authors. This ensures that the CrossMark logo is associated with the correct article and reflects the accurate metadata.
  3. Publication with CrossMark: After the peer review process is completed, and the article is accepted for publication, the CrossMark logo is formally incorporated into the article. The logo is placed on the first page of the published article, where it is easily visible to readers. This establishes a direct link between the article and the CrossMark system.
  4. Dynamic linking: Once published, the CrossMark logo acts as a dynamic link between the article and the CrossMark system. When readers encounter the CrossMark logo while accessing the article, they can click on it to access additional information about the article's status and any updates associated with it. The dynamic linking ensures that readers are seamlessly directed to the official version of the article hosted on the IgMin Research website.
  5. Types of changes tracked: The CrossMark system categorizes changes into three main types: minor corrections, major revisions, and article retractions. Minor corrections typically involve typographical errors, formatting adjustments, or other minor updates that do not alter the scientific content significantly. Major revisions, on the other hand, encompass substantial changes to the research findings, methodologies, or conclusions. Article retractions are reserved for instances of scientific misconduct or irreproducibility, and the CrossMark logo clearly indicates the retraction status when applicable.
  6. Updating CrossMark information: The responsibility for maintaining the accuracy of CrossMark information lies with the authors. If any changes are required after the article's initial publication, the authors promptly inform IgMin Research. The editorial team reviews the suggested changes to ensure their validity and relevance. Upon verification, the CrossMark information is updated, and readers are directed to the most recent version of the article through the CrossMark link.
  7. Reader engagement: Readers are encouraged to actively engage with the CrossMark system while accessing articles published in IgMin Research - STEM. Clicking on the CrossMark logo provides them with valuable insights into any updates or corrections that may have occurred since the article's publication. This engagement fosters a culture of continuous improvement, transparency, and accountability within the research community.
  8. Ensuring reliability and credibility: By implementing CrossMark, IgMin Research underscores its commitment to ensuring the reliability and credibility of the scholarly content it publishes. The CrossMark system provides a standardized approach to tracking changes and updates, reducing the likelihood of outdated or inaccurate information being disseminated.

In conclusion, the use of CrossMark at IgMin Research - STEM plays a pivotal role in reinforcing our commitment to transparent and reliable scholarly communication. The process involves incorporating the CrossMark logo during the author submission stage, undergoing editorial review, and publishing the article with the CrossMark logo prominently displayed. By engaging readers and dynamically linking the article to the CrossMark system, we empower our audience to access the most current and authoritative version of the research. This robust and systematic approach aligns with our mission of fostering a multidisciplinary research environment built on the pillars of integrity, accountability, and accessibility.

Using CrossMark at IgMin Research

The utilization of the CrossMark system at IgMin Research - STEM is an essential aspect of our commitment to enhancing the integrity and accessibility of scholarly articles. We encourage all authors submitting their manuscripts to include the CrossMark logo within their work. The incorporation of the CrossMark logo serves as a visual indicator of the article's participation in the CrossMark program and its commitment to transparency and ongoing updates. Here is a point-to-point elaboration of the process involved in using CrossMark at IgMin Research:

a. Submission with CrossMark logo: Authors submitting their research manuscripts to IgMin Research are encouraged to include the CrossMark logo within their documents. This logo, provided by CrossRef, is a distinct identifier that visually represents the article's participation in the CrossMark program.

b. Editorial team verification: Upon receiving a manuscript with the CrossMark logo, the editorial team at IgMin Research conducts a thorough review to ensure that the provided CrossMark information is accurate, relevant, and complies with the guidelines set forth by CrossRef. The team evaluates whether the article aligns with the scope and focus of the journal and if the CrossMark logo adheres to the recommended placement.

c. Peer review process: During the peer review process, reviewers are made aware of the presence of the CrossMark logo in the manuscript. This disclosure ensures that reviewers understand the author's commitment to transparency and potential updates to the article in the future.

d. CrossMark activation post-publication: Upon successful completion of the peer review process and final acceptance, the accepted manuscript is published in the journal. At this stage, the CrossMark logo is prominently displayed on the first page of the article, indicating that the article is a part of the CrossMark program.

e. Linking to official version: Once the article is published on the IgMin Research website, the CrossMark logo is associated with the official version hosted by the journal. This link ensures that readers can easily access the most current and reliable version of the article, regardless of where it is hosted or disseminated.

f. CrossMark updates: Authors are encouraged to promptly notify IgMin Research of any significant changes to their published articles. Such changes may include major revisions that affect the scientific content, findings, or conclusions, or instances that warrant an article retraction due to ethical concerns or irreproducibility.

g. Editorial team review of updates: When an author informs the editorial team about changes to their published article, the team conducts a careful review to ensure the accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness of the updates. This step is crucial to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record and ensuring that updates are consistent with the principles of ethical publishing.

h. Updated crossMark information: Following the editorial team's review, if the changes are deemed appropriate, the CrossMark information associated with the article is updated accordingly. This process is carried out promptly to minimize any potential confusion among readers.

i. CrossMark alert for retractions: In cases where an article is retracted due to ethical violations or other serious concerns, the CrossMark logo serves as a visible alert to readers. By clicking on the CrossMark logo, readers are redirected to an explanation of the article's retraction, thus ensuring transparency and accountability.

j. Reader engagement: Readers are encouraged to actively engage with the CrossMark system while accessing articles published in IgMin Research - STEM. By clicking on the CrossMark logo, readers can verify if any corrections, revisions, or retractions have been made since the article's initial publication. This interaction fosters a culture of continuous improvement and empowers readers with the most up-to-date information.

k. CrossMark and collaboration: As a multidisciplinary journal, IgMin Research acknowledges the significance of collaboration across various fields of study. The CrossMark system plays a pivotal role in accurately representing collaborative research efforts and ensuring that updates are promptly reflected to maintain the credibility and validity of collaborative works.

l. Advancing open science: By incorporating the CrossMark system, IgMin Research further reinforces its commitment to Open Science principles. CrossMark complements open access publishing and data sharing initiatives by promoting transparency, accessibility, and reproducibility of research findings.

In conclusion, the implementation of the CrossMark system at IgMin Research - STEM serves as a testament to our dedication to maintaining the integrity and credibility of scholarly articles. The process involved in using CrossMark encompasses various stages, from author submission and editorial team verification to post-publication updates and reader engagement. By encouraging the use of CrossMark, we strive to enhance transparency, facilitate access to the most current research, and promote responsible and ethical practices in scholarly publishing. Through the CrossMark system, IgMin Research - STEM continues to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge and foster an environment of trust and collaboration within the research community.

Types of Changes Tracked by CrossMark

The CrossMark system categorizes changes to scholarly articles into three main types, each serving a specific purpose in maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the research published in IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. These types of changes are as follows:

a. Minor corrections: Minor corrections are typographical errors, formatting issues, or other small adjustments that do not significantly affect the scientific content, conclusions, or interpretations of the article. These changes are considered routine and are intended to ensure the accuracy and readability of the published work. The process involved in tracking minor corrections through CrossMark includes:

  1. Identification: Authors or readers identify minor errors or issues in a published article that need to be corrected. These could be simple typographical mistakes, broken links, minor grammatical errors, or formatting inconsistencies.

  2. Notification: Authors promptly inform IgMin Research about the identified minor corrections. This notification includes a detailed description of the corrections needed and the rationale behind the changes.
  3. Editorial review: The editorial team at IgMin Research reviews the proposed corrections to ensure they indeed fall under the category of "minor corrections." The team evaluates the changes' impact on the article's scientific content and confirms that they do not alter the original research's findings or conclusions.
  4. Updating CrossMark information: Upon approval, IgMin Research updates the CrossMark metadata associated with the article to reflect the specific changes made. The CrossMark logo on the article's first page will indicate the presence of minor corrections and will link to the updated version of the article on the journal's website.

b. Major revisions: Major revisions involve significant changes to the scientific content, findings, or interpretations of an article. These revisions may result from new data, methodological updates, or novel insights that substantially impact the research's conclusions. The process involved in tracking major revisions through CrossMark includes:

  1. Identification: Authors or readers identify the need for major revisions in a published article, either through their own research or by critically examining the existing content.
  2. Author notification: Authors promptly notify IgMin Research about the need for major revisions. The notification includes a detailed explanation of the changes, the evidence supporting them, and the implications for the original research's conclusions.
  3. Editorial evaluation: The editorial team at IgMin Research conducts a thorough evaluation of the proposed major revisions. They assess the validity and significance of the new data, methodologies, or insights and their impact on the article's scientific integrity.
  4. Peer review (if required): Depending on the extent of the revisions, the editorial team may initiate a peer review process to ensure the proposed changes meet rigorous scholarly standards. External experts assess the revisions and provide feedback to the authors and editors.
  5. Updating CrossMark information: Once the major revisions are verified and accepted, IgMin Research updates the CrossMark metadata associated with the article. The CrossMark logo will indicate the presence of major revisions and will link to the updated version of the article on the journal's website.

c. Article retractions: Article retractions occur when significant issues of scientific misconduct, ethical violations, or irreproducibility are identified in a published article. Retractions are essential for maintaining the credibility of the scholarly record and ensuring that misleading or erroneous information is not perpetuated. The process involved in tracking article retractions through CrossMark includes:

  1. Detection of issues: Concerns about the validity or ethical conduct of a published article are identified by authors, readers, peer reviewers, or editorial staff.
  2. Internal review: The editorial team at IgMin Research conducts a comprehensive internal review of the concerns raised, which may involve consultation with external experts or relevant parties.
  3. Verification and decision: If the concerns are substantiated and deemed serious enough to warrant retraction, IgMin Research makes a formal decision to retract the article. This decision is based on the principles outlined in recognized guidelines such as COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
  4. Retraction statement: A clear and transparent retraction statement is prepared, explaining the reasons for the retraction and outlining the issues found in the original article.
  5. Updating CrossMark information: IgMin Research updates the CrossMark metadata associated with the retracted article, clearly indicating its retraction status. The CrossMark logo will link to the retraction statement, providing readers with access to the official explanation for the retraction.

By effectively tracking and documenting these types of changes through the CrossMark system, IgMin Research - STEM ensures that its published articles maintain a high level of accuracy, reliability, and transparency. This process promotes responsible research conduct, encourages ongoing improvements to scientific work, and reinforces the journal's commitment to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity.

Updating CrossMark Information

Updating CrossMark information is a critical process that ensures the accuracy and reliability of scholarly articles published in IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. As scientific knowledge evolves and new information becomes available, it is essential to keep published research up-to-date and transparent. The CrossMark system allows authors and the editorial team to collaborate in promptly communicating any changes to the articles, be it minor corrections, major revisions, or article retractions.

The process of updating CrossMark information involves several steps, each contributing to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Below is a point-to-point elaboration of the process involved:

  1. Identification of changes: The first step in the process is the identification of changes that need to be made to a published article. Authors, readers, or the editorial team may identify errors, omissions, or the necessity for updates based on new findings or developments. These changes may range from minor typographical errors to more substantial revisions that impact the scientific content and conclusions of the article.
  2. Communication with authors: Once the changes are identified, the authors are contacted to inform them of the necessary updates. Authors play a crucial role in the CrossMark system, as they are responsible for providing accurate and relevant information regarding any changes to their articles. Prompt and transparent communication with authors is essential to ensure that the CrossMark information is comprehensive and up-to-date.
  3. Evaluation of changes: The editorial team evaluates the proposed changes to determine their significance and appropriateness. Minor corrections, such as typographical errors, are typically straightforward to verify and may not require extensive review. However, major revisions and article retractions demand more rigorous examination to ensure that the scientific integrity of the article is preserved.
  4. Review and approval: In cases where major revisions or article retractions are proposed, the editorial team engages in a thorough review process. This may involve consulting subject matter experts, evaluating additional data, and assessing the impact of the changes on the article's conclusions. Transparent and impartial review procedures are followed to uphold the journal's commitment to ethical publishing.
  5. Author confirmation and documentation: Authors are required to confirm the proposed changes and provide any supporting documentation necessary to substantiate the updates. This documentation may include revised data, methodology descriptions, or references to published errata. It is essential to maintain a transparent record of the changes made to the article, ensuring that readers can easily access the supporting information if needed.
  6. Updating the CrossMark information: Once the changes are reviewed and approved, the CrossMark information is updated accordingly. The official version of the article hosted on the IgMin Research website is amended to reflect the modifications made. The CrossMark logo on the first page of the article is then linked to the updated version, enabling readers to access the most current and accurate version of the research.
  7. Communication with readers: To maintain transparency and keep readers informed, any significant updates to an article are communicated explicitly. IgMin Research employs various communication channels, such as notification alerts on the website or email notifications to subscribers, to inform readers about the changes made to the article. This communication is crucial to ensure that readers are aware of the updates and can access the most recent version of the research.
  8. Archiving of previous versions: To preserve the scholarly record, previous versions of the article are archived with clear indications of their status and links to the updated version. This archiving practice enables researchers to track the evolution of an article over time and understand the reasons behind any changes that have occurred.
  9. Monitoring and continuous improvement: The process of updating CrossMark information is an ongoing and iterative one. IgMin Research remains vigilant in monitoring articles even after updates have been made. Reader feedback and post-publication peer review also contribute to identifying potential improvements or addressing any further issues that may arise.

In conclusion, the process of updating CrossMark information at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal is a meticulous and collaborative effort involving authors, the editorial team, and readers. By following a structured approach to identify, evaluate, and implement changes, the journal ensures the integrity of published research and fosters an environment of transparency and accountability. The CrossMark system empowers the research community to continuously improve and disseminate reliable and up-to-date scientific knowledge.

Engaging Readers through CrossMark

At IgMin Research, we believe in fostering an active and informed readership that actively engages with the scholarly content we publish. The CrossMark system plays a pivotal role in facilitating this engagement by providing readers with a straightforward and effective means to access the most up-to-date version of each article and stay informed about any changes or updates that may have occurred since its initial publication. Let's explore the step-by-step process involved in engaging readers through CrossMark:

Step 1: Identification of the CrossMark logo

Upon publication of an article in IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, the CrossMark logo will be prominently displayed on the first page of the article. This distinctive logo serves as a visual indicator to readers that the article is associated with the CrossMark system, implying that there might be additional information or updates available for the article.

Step 2: Accessing the official version

When readers come across an article with the CrossMark logo, they can interact with the logo to access the official version of the article hosted on the IgMin Research website. By clicking on the logo, readers will be redirected to the official article page, where they can access the full text and supplementary material, if applicable.

Step 3: Verification of CrossMark status

Once on the official article page, readers will immediately encounter the CrossMark status box. This box will provide essential information regarding the article's current status, such as whether it has received any updates, corrections, or retractions since its original publication. This step encourages readers to actively engage with the research content and stay informed about any changes that may have occurred.

Step 4: Tracking updates and corrections

For readers interested in staying abreast of the latest developments in a particular field of study, the CrossMark status box becomes an invaluable tool. It allows readers to verify if the article has undergone any minor corrections or major revisions. In the case of minor corrections, the CrossMark status box may indicate the nature of the changes made to the article, assuring readers of the journal's commitment to accuracy and accountability.

Step 5: Retraction information

In instances where an article has been retracted due to ethical concerns or other reasons, the CrossMark status box will provide a clear notification of the retraction. By clicking on this notification, readers will be directed to an explanation for the retraction, which may include details about the reasons for the retraction and the steps taken to rectify any potential issues.

Step 6: Timely engagement with research

The CrossMark system encourages readers to actively participate in the scientific dialogue by promoting timely engagement with research findings. As science evolves and new evidence emerges, authors may update their published articles to reflect the latest knowledge. By engaging with the CrossMark system, readers can be confident that they are accessing the most current and accurate information available.

Step 7: Supporting reproducibility and verification

In the pursuit of robust scientific research, reproducibility and verification of results play a vital role. The CrossMark system aids in this process by providing researchers with access to any updates or corrections made to previously published articles. This transparency fosters a culture of openness and accountability within the research community, supporting the validation and refinement of scientific findings.

Step 8: Facilitating scholarly dialogue

By actively engaging with the CrossMark system, readers can contribute to the scholarly dialogue surrounding published articles. Researchers may welcome feedback and commentary on their work, leading to constructive discussions that can drive the field forward. Engaging with the CrossMark system enhances the sense of community and collaboration in the scientific endeavor.

Step 9: Promoting open and transparent science

The CrossMark system aligns with the principles of Open Science, which emphasize transparency, accessibility, and the sharing of research outputs. By using CrossMark, IgMin Research underscores its commitment to promoting openness in scholarly communication and encouraging greater involvement and accountability from both authors and readers.

Step 10: Encouraging continuous learning

For students, early-career researchers, and other individuals seeking to expand their knowledge, the CrossMark system provides a reliable pathway to access the most accurate and updated scientific information. This fosters a culture of continuous learning, enabling readers to remain current with the latest advancements in their respective fields.

In conclusion, engaging readers through the CrossMark system is a critical component of IgMin Research's commitment to fostering an informed and collaborative research community. The process of accessing the official version of articles, verifying CrossMark status, tracking updates, and exploring retraction information enables readers to actively participate in the scholarly dialogue. By encouraging transparency, supporting reproducibility, and promoting open science, the CrossMark system enhances the integrity and impact of the research we publish. Through these efforts, IgMin Research strives to be a trusted source of knowledge, facilitating the dissemination of cutting-edge research and encouraging a culture of continuous learning and improvement within the scientific community.

Transparency and Accountability

Transparency and accountability are foundational principles of IgMin Research's CrossMark Policy, ensuring that the scholarly publishing process remains open, trustworthy, and conducive to scientific advancement. The implementation of the CrossMark system reinforces these principles by providing a clear and reliable trail of any changes made to published articles, enabling researchers, readers, and other stakeholders to access the most up-to-date and accurate versions of each article. Let us delve into the point-by-point elaboration of the process involved in promoting transparency and accountability through CrossMark:

a. Identification of changes: The first step towards ensuring transparency and accountability is identifying the changes that occur in published articles. Authors, as well as the editorial team at IgMin Research, actively monitor articles for any potential updates, corrections, or retractions. This constant vigilance is vital in maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record.

b. Author notification: When authors identify the need for a change in their published articles, they are required to promptly inform IgMin Research. This notification includes providing a detailed explanation of the proposed changes, along with the reason for their implementation. The authors are responsible for ensuring that the CrossMark information accurately reflects the nature of the change.

c. Editorial review: Upon receiving notification from the authors, the editorial team at IgMin Research undertakes a thorough review of the proposed changes. This review process entails evaluating the relevance and significance of the alterations, ensuring they adhere to ethical guidelines and do not compromise the article's integrity. The editorial team may seek additional peer-review and consultation with subject matter experts, if necessary, to make informed decisions.

d. Verification and validation: Transparency and accountability are achieved through a rigorous verification and validation process. The editorial team diligently cross-references the proposed changes with the original article, examining the accuracy and appropriateness of the modifications. It is essential to maintain a balance between updating scientific knowledge and preserving the historical context of the research.

e. Update documentation: Once the verification and validation process is complete, the editorial team documents the approved changes and updates the CrossMark information accordingly. This documentation includes a clear record of the modification, the date of the change, and the rationale behind it. This step ensures that the evolution of the article is transparent and traceable.

f. CrossMark linking: With the updated CrossMark information in place, the CrossMark logo on the article's first page is linked to the latest version of the article hosted on the IgMin Research website. The logo serves as a visible indicator to readers that the article has undergone changes, prompting them to click and access the most recent and accurate version.

g. Communication to readers: Ensuring transparency involves transparently communicating changes to readers. IgMin Research employs various channels to notify readers of the updates made to articles. This communication may include alerts on the journal's website, email notifications to registered users, and relevant announcements through social media platforms. Clear and accessible communication helps readers stay informed and engaged with the evolving body of knowledge.

h. Retraction statements: In cases where a published article is retracted due to ethical violations, irreproducibility, or other serious concerns, the CrossMark logo will indicate the retraction status. The retraction statement, which provides an explanation for the retraction, will be prominently linked to the article. Retractions are essential for maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record and ensuring that incorrect or misleading information is promptly addressed.

i. Handling disputes: Transparency and accountability involve addressing disputes and concerns from authors, readers, or other stakeholders regarding changes to published articles. IgMin Research adopts an open and constructive approach to resolving disputes, engaging with all parties involved, and seeking input from independent experts when necessary. Dispute resolution is guided by the principles of fairness and objectivity.

j. Continual monitoring and Improvement: Transparency and accountability are ongoing commitments. IgMin Research continually monitors the effectiveness of its CrossMark Policy, seeking feedback from authors and readers, and analyzing the impact of updates and retractions on the overall quality of published research. The journal remains receptive to suggestions for improvement and adapts its processes to further enhance transparency and accountability.

In conclusion, transparency and accountability form the bedrock of the CrossMark Policy at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. Through a systematic and robust process of identification, verification, and documentation of changes, the journal ensures that readers have access to the most accurate and up-to-date research articles. By upholding these principles, IgMin Research aims to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge, foster a culture of integrity in research, and strengthen the trust between authors, readers, and the scientific community at large.

Leveraging CrossMark for Ethical Publishing

Ethical publishing is a foundational principle of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal, and the implementation of the CrossMark system serves as a valuable tool in upholding the highest standards of integrity and accountability in scholarly research. By leveraging CrossMark, IgMin Research reaffirms its commitment to addressing ethical concerns promptly and transparently, ensuring the dissemination of accurate and reliable scientific knowledge.

Elaboration of the process

The process of leveraging CrossMark for ethical publishing involves several key steps, each contributing to the maintenance of a robust and trustworthy scholarly record:

  1. Detecting ethical concerns: Ethical concerns in scholarly research may arise due to various reasons, such as data fabrication, plagiarism, duplicate publication, authorship disputes, or conflicts of interest. The detection of such concerns can occur through rigorous peer review, post-publication assessments, or via alerts raised by the academic community.
  2. Internal review: Upon receiving information about potential ethical concerns related to a published article, IgMin Research initiates an internal review process. This involves the involvement of the journal's editorial board, ethics committee, and relevant subject matter experts.
  3. Assessment of concerns: During the internal review, the specific ethical concern is carefully evaluated and verified for its validity and significance. The review process adheres to established ethical guidelines, including those set forth by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
  4. Communication with authors: If the internal review substantiates the presence of ethical concerns, IgMin Research contacts the article's corresponding author or authors to seek clarification and gather additional information. Open and transparent communication with the authors is crucial during this phase to ensure fairness and accuracy.
  5. Correction, retraction, or expression of concern: The course of action taken by IgMin Research depends on the severity and nature of the identified ethical concern. The potential outcomes may include:
    1. Correction: In cases where minor errors or inaccuracies are identified that do not invalidate the overall findings of the article, a correction notice is issued. The CrossMark system is then updated with the corrected information, allowing readers to access the revised version.
    2. Retraction: In situations where serious ethical violations, research misconduct, or irreproducibility are discovered, the article may be retracted from the journal. A retraction notice is issued, and the CrossMark logo on the article's page is updated to indicate the retraction status.
    3. Expression of concern: If the investigation into the ethical concern is ongoing, but conclusive evidence is not yet available, IgMin Research may issue an expression of concern. The CrossMark system will be updated to notify readers of the ongoing investigation and the need for caution when interpreting the article's findings.
  6. Transparency in communication: Throughout the entire process, IgMin Research maintains transparency in its communication with authors, readers, and the academic community. Information regarding corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern is communicated promptly through the journal's website and other appropriate channels.
  7. Cooperation with indexing services: IgMin Research collaborates with indexing services, databases, and other repositories where the article is hosted to ensure that the CrossMark information is updated uniformly across all platforms. This coordinated effort guarantees that readers accessing the article from various sources are directed to the latest version and informed of any ethical concerns.
  8. Prevention and education: In addition to addressing ethical concerns reactively, IgMin Research also emphasizes proactive measures to prevent ethical issues. This includes conducting rigorous peer review, promoting ethical authorship practices, encouraging data sharing and transparency, and educating authors on ethical considerations in research.
  9. Collaboration with ethical committees: IgMin Research actively collaborates with ethical committees and professional organizations to stay informed about emerging ethical concerns and best practices in academic publishing. Such collaborations strengthen the journal's ability to address ethical challenges effectively.
  10. Continuous improvement: IgMin Research recognizes that ethical publishing is an evolving landscape, and the journal remains committed to continuous improvement in its ethical policies and practices. Feedback from the academic community is valued and taken into account during the refinement of the CrossMark Policy and other aspects of the journal's operations.

In conclusion, leveraging the CrossMark system for ethical publishing reinforces IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal's dedication to upholding the highest ethical standards in scholarly research. By implementing a comprehensive process that includes detection, internal review, transparent communication, and cooperation with indexing services, the journal ensures the dissemination of credible and reliable scientific knowledge. The integration of CrossMark in the ethical publishing process underscores IgMin Research's commitment to promoting responsible research conduct and maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record.

Collaborative Research and CrossMark

Collaborative research lies at the heart of IgMin Research's multidisciplinary approach to advancing scientific knowledge. Embracing the principles of transparency, accountability, and open collaboration, the CrossMark system plays a pivotal role in accurately representing and continuously updating research that emerges from collaborative efforts. This section explores how CrossMark facilitates the dissemination of collaborative research and its implications for enhancing the credibility and impact of multidisciplinary scholarship.

Elaboration of the process

  1. Identifying collaborative research: The first step in the CrossMark process for collaborative research is identifying articles resulting from joint efforts among researchers from different disciplines or institutions. Collaborative research often brings together diverse expertise, enabling a comprehensive exploration of complex scientific questions. At IgMin Research, we actively encourage researchers to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries and acknowledge such collaboration in their manuscripts.
  2. CrossMark inclusion in manuscripts: Authors engaged in collaborative research are encouraged to include the CrossMark logo and related information within their submitted manuscripts. By doing so, authors signal their commitment to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the research findings and acknowledge that updates or corrections may be necessary as the work progresses.
  3. Peer review and crossMark verification: During the peer-review process, the editorial team pays special attention to the collaborative nature of the research and verifies the inclusion of the CrossMark information. This step ensures that the CrossMark logo is correctly incorporated and linked to the official version of the article upon publication.
  4. Continuous updates and iterative research: Collaborative research often involves an iterative process of refinement, where ongoing discussions, data sharing, and interdisciplinary exchanges occur. The CrossMark system aligns seamlessly with this dynamic approach, allowing authors to update their published articles as new insights emerge and collaborative efforts yield additional results.
  5. CrossMark's role in cross-disciplinary citation: As researchers from different disciplines come together to address complex challenges, their work gains visibility beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. CrossMark helps ensure that such collaborative articles are accurately represented and easily identifiable, enhancing their visibility and accessibility within the academic community.
  6. Data sharing and transparency: Collaborative research often involves the exchange and integration of data from multiple sources. CrossMark supports data transparency by linking to supplemental materials, datasets, or source code repositories, further facilitating reproducibility and openness in multidisciplinary research.
  7. CrossMark and global collaboration: Collaborative research knows no geographic boundaries, with researchers from different countries contributing to shared knowledge. The CrossMark system provides a standardized approach to ensure that updates and corrections are communicated effectively across borders, enabling global collaboration and engagement with the latest research outcomes.
  8. Community engagement and feedback: Collaborative research is often highly relevant to real-world problems and societal challenges. Through CrossMark, researchers can respond to feedback and critiques from the broader scientific community, ensuring that the ongoing dialogue contributes to the continuous improvement of the research and its potential applications.
  9. CrossMark and research impact: Collaboration fosters the generation of high-impact research with broad implications. The CrossMark system helps to track the evolution of such impactful research, providing a record of the scholarly journey from the initial publication to subsequent updates or revisions. This comprehensive view of the research's progress enriches the understanding of its influence over time.
  10. Facilitating multidisciplinary synthesis: CrossMark's incorporation into collaborative research articles aids in synthesizing knowledge across disciplines. As researchers from diverse backgrounds come together, the CrossMark logo serves as a beacon guiding readers to a centralized and reliable source for integrated knowledge.

In conclusion, the CrossMark system is a valuable asset for collaborative research at IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal. By encouraging collaboration across disciplines and incorporating CrossMark in collaborative research articles, we foster a culture of transparent and iterative scholarship. The process of using CrossMark in collaborative research enables ongoing updates, data sharing, and interdisciplinary engagement, facilitating the dissemination of impactful research with broader implications. Through this integration, IgMin Research strengthens its commitment to promoting multidisciplinary knowledge exchange, scholarly collaboration, and the advancement of science in an interconnected global research landscape.

CrossMark in the Context of Open Science

CrossMark is an invaluable tool that aligns seamlessly with the principles of Open Science, a transformative movement seeking to make scientific research more accessible, transparent, and collaborative. As IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal embraces Open Science principles, the integration of CrossMark further reinforces our commitment to advancing scholarly communication in a progressive and responsible manner. Let us explore the various ways CrossMark complements and enhances Open Science initiatives:

Point 1: Transparency and accessibility

CrossMark Process: By incorporating the CrossMark logo in published articles, IgMin Research fosters transparency and accessibility. When readers click on the CrossMark logo, they are directed to the official version of the article, ensuring easy access to the latest research updates. This transparency is a cornerstone of Open Science, where research outputs are made freely available to all stakeholders, promoting a more inclusive and democratized scientific ecosystem.

Point 2: Version control and authorship attribution

CrossMark Process: CrossMark offers clear version control by indicating any minor corrections, major revisions, or article retractions. This process aids in establishing a clear timeline of changes made to the article. Additionally, the CrossMark system ensures proper authorship attribution, mitigating concerns related to plagiarism and ensuring due credit is given to the original authors.

Point 3: Collaborative research and reproducibility

CrossMark Process: In collaborative research projects, where multiple authors and institutions contribute to a study, CrossMark helps maintain consistency and accuracy in the dissemination of findings. Readers can easily track the latest version of a collaborative research paper, promoting reproducibility and enabling researchers to build upon each other's work effectively.

Point 4: Data sharing and citation metrics

CrossMark Process: Open Science emphasizes the sharing of research data to facilitate validation and collaboration. With CrossMark, readers can ascertain the authenticity of the data presented in an article, enabling them to assess the quality and reliability of research. Furthermore, CrossMark aids in accurate citation metrics, as it provides a reliable link to the definitive version of an article, preventing citation of outdated or incorrect information.

Point 5: Ethical considerations and retractions

CrossMark Process: Open Science upholds ethical standards in research, and CrossMark plays a pivotal role in this context. In cases of ethical violations or irreproducibility, the CrossMark logo serves as a prominent alert, linking to retraction statements or updates. This proactive approach ensures that misleading or flawed research is promptly corrected, promoting trust in the scientific community.

Point 6: Continuous improvement and post-publication peer review

CrossMark Process: Open Science encourages ongoing collaboration and feedback after publication. With CrossMark, researchers can update their articles with additional data or insights based on post-publication peer review, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. This iterative process aligns with Open Science principles, where research is viewed as a dynamic and evolving endeavor.

Point 7: Community engagement and public understanding

CrossMark Process: Open Science seeks to engage the broader community, including policymakers and the public. CrossMark's clear and accessible link to the latest article version allows diverse audiences to access accurate and up-to-date scientific information. This promotes greater understanding of research outcomes and their implications, facilitating evidence-based decision-making.

Point 8: Preservation and long-term accessibility

CrossMark Process: CrossMark contributes to the long-term preservation of scholarly articles. As the CrossMark logo ensures readers are directed to the official version hosted by IgMin Research, the journal takes responsibility for maintaining the article's accessibility over time. This commitment aligns with the archiving and preservation principles advocated by Open Science initiatives.

Point 9: Integration with open access publishing

CrossMark Process: Open access publishing aims to make research freely available to the global community. CrossMark's seamless integration with open access articles ensures that readers can easily identify and access the most current and accurate versions of research outputs, enhancing the visibility and impact of published works.

Point 10: Advancing scientific knowledge and collaboration

CrossMark Process: Open Science and CrossMark share a common goal: to advance scientific knowledge through collaboration and transparency. By employing the CrossMark system, IgMin Research facilitates a dynamic exchange of ideas and data among researchers, accelerating the pace of discovery and innovation in STEM fields.

In supposition, the integration of CrossMark within IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal aligns with the principles of Open Science, reinforcing our commitment to fostering transparent, collaborative, and responsible scholarly communication. Through CrossMark, we enhance the accessibility and reliability of published research, empower readers with the latest updates, and contribute to the progress of science in the global community. As advocates of Open Science, we embrace CrossMark as a valuable tool that supports our mission to make scientific knowledge freely available, discoverable, and impactful for the betterment of society as a whole.

The CrossMark Policy of IgMin Research - STEM | A Multidisciplinary Open Access Journal represents a commitment to fostering an environment of responsible and transparent academic publishing. By implementing the CrossMark system, we aim to strengthen the integrity of scholarly communication and ensure that our readers have access to the most current and reliable versions of published research. The adoption of CrossMark reflects our dedication to advancing the frontiers of scientific knowledge while upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and ethics.