Help ?

IGMIN: We're glad you're here. Please click 'create a new query' if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.

If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click 'take me to my Query.'

Search

Organised by  IgMin Fevicon

Regional sites

Browse by Subjects

Welcome to IgMin Research – an Open Access journal uniting Biology, Medicine, and Engineering. We’re dedicated to advancing global knowledge and fostering collaboration across scientific fields.

Browse by Sections

At IgMin Research, we bridge the frontiers of Biology, Medicine, and Engineering to foster interdisciplinary innovation. Our expanded scope now embraces a wide spectrum of scientific disciplines, empowering global researchers to explore, contribute, and collaborate through open access.

Members

Our goal is to create channels of communication that support quick research advancements.

Articles

Our goal is to create channels of communication that support quick research advancements.

Explore Content

Our goal is to create channels of communication that support quick research advancements.

Identify Us

Our goal is to create channels of communication that support quick research advancements.

IgMin Corporation

Welcome to IgMin, a leading platform dedicated to enhancing knowledge dissemination and professional growth across multiple fields of science, technology, and the humanities. We believe in the power of open access, collaboration, and innovation. Our goal is to provide individuals and organizations with the tools they need to succeed in the global knowledge economy.

Publications Support
[email protected]
E-Books Support
[email protected]
Webinars & Conferences Support
[email protected]
Content Writing Support
[email protected]
IT Support
[email protected]

Search

Select Language

Explore Section

Content for the explore section slider goes here.

197 of 197
Melanocytic Nevi Classification using Transfer Learning
Uma Mahesh RNHarsha Jain HJ, Hemanth Kumar CS, Shreyash Umrao and Mohith DL
END
Abstract

Abstract at IgMin Research

Our goal is to create channels of communication that support quick research advancements.

Engineering Group Perspective Article ID: igmin308

Human Missions to Mars Using the Starship

Aerospace Engineering DOI10.61927/igmin308 Affiliation

Affiliation

    1445 Indiana Ave., South Pasadena, CA 91030, USA

32
VIEWS
11
DOWNLOADS
Connect with Us

Abstract

A human mission to Mars has been widely regarded as the ultimate goal for space exploration in our time. Exploration of Mars has been limited to observations from orbit and a few rover expeditions that each cover about 20 km. The vast amount of Mars surface remains to be explored in situ. These limitations were mainly due to the cost of launching high mass payloads to Mars. After 100 years and a thousand studies, human missions to Mars remain in an early concept stage. The advent of the SpaceX Starship with its putative capability to affordably land a 100 MT payload on Mars enables new, more ambitious approaches for exploring Mars at a grander scale. Here, we outline a mission to scientifically explore a wide swath of Mars utilizing the SpaceX Starship to deliver unprecedented amounts of materiel to Mars. A main landing site provides the command-and-control hub for distributed assets across Mars. A pair of communication satellites enables almost instantaneous command, control, and data retrieval. While SpaceX viewed this mission as an early step in establishing a settlement on Mars, we view it as an opportunity to scientifically explore the planet. Two variations of the mission employ different approaches for returning from Mars. The Mars Leviathan mission utilizes a Starship to leave LEO, land on Mars, and return from Mars to LEO. The major challenge in the “Mars Leviathan” mission is to produce a large mass of propellants via ISRU to ascend the crew of 12 in a Starship from Mars and return to Earth. Alternatively, we propose a “DRA-6” mission that uses a Starship to leave LEO and land on Mars, but for return, it uses a small capsule to lift a crew of six from Mars and rendezvous with an Earth Return Vehicle waiting in Mars orbit. The added capability of Starship enables the avoidance of the challenges involved in utilizing indigenous water on Mars by bringing water from Earth. In addition, water for life support is brought from Earth.

References

    1. Zubrin R. The case for Mars. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2011.
    2. Hoffman SJ, Kaplan DI, editors. Human exploration of Mars: the reference mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team. NASA Spec Publ 6107. Washington (DC): National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 1997.
    3. Platoff A. Eyes on the red planet: human Mars mission planning, 1952–1970. NASA/CR-2001-208928. Washington (DC): NASA; 2001.
    4. Portree DSF. Humans to Mars: fifty years of mission planning, 1950–2000. Monogr Aerosp Hist Ser No. 21. Washington (DC): NASA History Division, Office of Policy and Plans; 2001.
    5. Rapp D. Human missions to Mars. 3rd ed. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Praxis Books; Springer; 2023.
    6. Jones H. Humans to Mars will cost about half a trillion dollars and life support roughly two billion dollars. 46th Int Conf Environ Syst. 2016 Jul 10–14; Vienna, Austria. ICES-2016-111.
    7. Evans LG, Reedy RC, Starr RD, Kerry KE, Boynton WV. Analysis of gamma ray spectra measured by Mars Odyssey. J Geophys Res Planets. 2006;111(E3):1–20.
    8. Artemis. Washington (DC): National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2024.
    9. Rapp D. The value of utilization of extraterrestrial resources for propellant production for space exploration. Acad Eng Stud. 2024;2(4):1–10.
    10. Rapp D. Lunar-derived propellants for fueling Mars-bound spacecraft in cis-lunar space. IgMin. 2024;2(9):744–751.
    11. Rapp D. Use of extraterrestrial resources and recycling water: curb your enthusiasm. IgMin. 2024;2(9):775–784.
    12. Rapp D. Near-term NASA Mars and lunar in situ propellant production: complexity versus simplicity. Space Sci Technol. 2024;4(118).
    13. Drake BG. Human exploration of Mars—design reference architecture 5.0 (DRA-5). NASA Spec Publ SP-2009-566. Washington (DC): NASA; 2009.
    14. Bleacher J, Rucker M. Human Mars exploration. Presented at: Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG); 2021.
    15. Rucker M. NASA’s Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) human Mars architecture. Presented at: 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference; 2022 Mar 7; Big Sky, MT.
    16. Rucker M, Craig DA, Burke LM, Chai PR, Chappell MB, et al. NASA’s Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) human Mars architecture. NASA Report; 2022.
    17. Rapp D. Will SpaceX send humans to Mars in 2028? IgMin Res. 2024;2(12):969–983.
    18. Moon to Mars architecture. Washington (DC): National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2024.
    19. Jones HW. The recent large reduction in space launch costs. Presented at: 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2018 Jul 8–12; Albuquerque, NM. Paper ICES-2018-81.
    20. Jones HW. Take material to space or make it there? Presented at: 2023 ASCEND Conference; 2023; Las Vegas, NV.
    21. Making humanity interplanetary. Hawthorne (CA): SpaceX; 2024.
    22. SpaceX's Mars colony plan: how Elon Musk plans to build a million-person Martian city. 2024.
    23. Maiwald V, Bauerfeind M, Fälker S, Westphal B, Bach C. About feasibility of SpaceX's human exploration Mars mission scenario with Starship. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):11804. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20718.
    24. Kingdon J. 3 months transit time to Mars for human missions using SpaceX Starship. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1).
    25. Golombek M, Williams N, Wooster P, McEwen A, Putzig N, Bramson A, et al. SpaceX Starship landing sites on Mars. Presented at: 52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference; 2021.
    26. Rapp D, Inglezakis V. A review of water on Mars. To be submitted to: Appl Sci. 2025.
    27. Thunnissen DP, Guernsey CS, Baker RS, Miyake RN. Advanced space storable propellants for outer planet exploration. Jet Propulsion Laboratory; 2004.
    28. Hurlbert EA, Whitley R, Klem MD, Johnson W, Alexander L, D'Aversa E. et al. International Space Exploration Coordination Group assessment of technology gaps for LOx/methane propulsion systems for the Global Exploration Roadmap. Presented at: AIAA 2016-5280; 2016.
    29. Rapp D. Mars ascent propellants and life support resources - Take it or make it? IgMin Res. 2024;2(7):673-682.
    30. The Space Review. What future for SpaceX? 2025.
    31. The Hill. Starship’s ninth test creates problems for Elon Musk. 2025.

Similar Articles

Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs) on Maize Stem Borer Infestation
Muhammad Salman Hameed, Khurshied Ahmed Khan, Nida Urooj and Ijaz Rasool Noorka
DOI10.61927/igmin147

Why publish with us?

  • Global Visibility – Indexed in major databases

  • Fast Peer Review – Decision within 14–21 days

  • Open Access – Maximize readership and citation

  • Multidisciplinary Scope – Biology, Medicine and Engineering

  • Editorial Board Excellence – Global experts involved

  • University Library Indexing – Via OCLC

  • Permanent Archiving – CrossRef DOI

  • APC – Affordable APCs with discounts

  • Citation – High Citation Potential

Submit Your Article

Advertisement