Help ?

IGMIN: We're glad you're here. Please click 'create a new query' if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.

If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click 'take me to my Query.'

Search

Organised by  IgMin Fevicon

Regional sites

Browse by Subjects

Welcome to IgMin Research – an Open Access journal uniting Biology, Medicine, and Engineering. We’re dedicated to advancing global knowledge and fostering collaboration across scientific fields.

Browse by Sections

At IgMin Research, we bridge the frontiers of Biology, Medicine, and Engineering to foster interdisciplinary innovation. Our expanded scope now embraces a wide spectrum of scientific disciplines, empowering global researchers to explore, contribute, and collaborate through open access.

Members

We strive to create opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement to push the boundaries of knowledge.

Articles

We strive to create opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement to push the boundaries of knowledge.

Explore Content

We strive to create opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement to push the boundaries of knowledge.

Identify Us

We strive to create opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement to push the boundaries of knowledge.

IgMin Corporation

Welcome to IgMin, a leading platform dedicated to enhancing knowledge dissemination and professional growth across multiple fields of science, technology, and the humanities. We believe in the power of open access, collaboration, and innovation. Our goal is to provide individuals and organizations with the tools they need to succeed in the global knowledge economy.

Publications Support
[email protected]
E-Books Support
[email protected]
Webinars & Conferences Support
[email protected]
Content Writing Support
[email protected]
IT Support
[email protected]

Search

Select Language

Explore Section

Content for the explore section slider goes here.

Abstract

Abstract at IgMin Research

We strive to create opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement to push the boundaries of knowledge.

Medicine Group Systematic Review Article ID: igmin314

Barriers and Enablers to the Adoption of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Sub-Saharan Africa Health Financing Decisions Systematic Review

Public Health DOI10.61927/igmin314 Affiliation

Affiliation

    Department of Health Management and Informatics, Kenyatta University, Kenya

8
VIEWS
11
DOWNLOADS
Connect with Us

Abstract

Background: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is increasingly recognized as a critical tool for evidence-based health financing decisions in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, its adoption is influenced by a variety of factors. This study synthesizes evidence from the literature on the factors enabling and hindering HTA institutionalization in the region as a means of supporting universal health coverage (UHC).
Methods: A systematic analysis of eight country-specific nonsystematic review studies covering Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Ghana, and Uganda was conducted. The studies employed qualitative (n = 5), mixed-methods (n = 1), cross-sectional survey (n = 1), and descriptive analysis (n = 1) approaches, with sample sizes ranging from 20–60 stakeholders, including policymakers and health professionals. Barriers and enablers were categorized into five themes: human resource capacity, financial and infrastructural constraints, policy and governance frameworks, stakeholder engagement and political will, and data and evidence availability.
Results: Seventeen barriers and sixteen enablers were identified. The key barriers included limited technical capacity (5 studies), financial constraints (4 studies), a lack of standardized HTA frameworks and guidelines (3 studies), political interference (1 study), limited evidence use (1 study), and cultural/legal challenges (1 study) The enablers included stakeholder engagement (3 studies), political will and UHC alignment (2 studies), capacity building (3 studies), legal/institutional frameworks (2 studies), international collaboration (2 studies), and transparent policymaking (1 study). Countries such as Kenya and Ethiopia have progressed through institutional structures and international support, while resource and governance challenges have persisted across contexts.
Conclusion: HTA adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa is hindered by human resource shortages, funding limitations, and weak governance, but facilitated by stakeholder engagement, political commitment, and international partnerships. Tailored interventions, including capacity building, sustainable financing, and standardized frameworks, are essential for institutionalizing HTA and advancing evidence-based health financing for UHC. Future research should explore underrepresented countries and employ longitudinal designs to increase generalizability.

Figures

References

    1. Downey LE, Mehndiratta A, Grover A, Gauba V, Sheikh K, Prinja S, Singh R, Cluzeau FA, Dabak S, Teerawattananon Y, Kumar S, Swaminathan S. Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the Medical Technology Assessment Board in India. BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jun 26;2(2):e000259. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000259. PMID: 29225927; PMCID: PMC5717947.
    2. Kriza C, Hanass-Hancock J, Odame EA, Deghaye N, Aman R, Wahlster P, Marin M, Gebe N, Akhwale W, Wachsmuth I, Kolominsky-Rabas PL. A systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Dec 2;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-66. PMID: 25466570; PMCID: PMC4265527.
    3. Mbau R, Vassall A, Gilson L, Barasa E. Factors influencing institutionalization of health technology assessment in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09673-4. PMID: 37349812; PMCID: PMC10288787.
    4. Behzadifar M, Shahabi S, Bakhtiari A, Azari S, Yarahmadi M, Martini M, Behzadifar M. Challenges in adopting health technology assessment for evidence-based policy in Iran: a qualitative study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Apr 23;44(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00887-2. PMID: 40269979; PMCID: PMC12020206.
    5. Hollingworth S, Fenny AP, Yu SY, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K. Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 7;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5. PMID: 34233710; PMCID: PMC8261797.
    6. Erku D, Walker D, Caruso AA, Wubishet B, Assefa Y, Abera S, Hailu A, Scuffham P. Institutionalizing health technology assessment in Ethiopia: seizing the window of opportunity. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jul 21;39(1):e49. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000454. PMID: 37477002; PMCID: PMC11570159.
    7. Gautier L, Ridde V. Health financing policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: government ownership or donors' influence? A scoping review of policymaking processes. Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Aug 8;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0043-x. PMID: 29202091; PMCID: PMC5683243.
    8. McCollum R, Theobald S, Otiso L, Martineau T, Karuga R, Barasa E, Molyneux S, Taegtmeyer M. Priority setting for health in the context of devolution in Kenya: implications for health equity and community-based primary care. Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jul 1;33(6):729-742. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy043. PMID: 29846599; PMCID: PMC6005116.
    9. Oortwijn WJ, Vondeling H, Bouter L. The use of societal criteria in priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands. Initial experiences and future challenges. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Spring;14(2):226-36. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012216. PMID: 9611899.
    10. Barasa EW, Cleary S, Molyneux S, English M. Setting healthcare priorities: a description and evaluation of the budgeting and planning process in county hospitals in Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2017 Apr 1;32(3):329-337. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw132. PMID: 27679522; PMCID: PMC5362066.
    11. Mfutso-Bengo J, Jeremiah F, Kasende-Chinguwo F, Ng'ambi W, Nkungula N, Kazanga-Chiumia I, Juma M, Chawani M, Chinkhumba J, Twea P, Chirwa E, Langwe K, Manthalu G, Ngwira LG, Nkhoma D, Colbourn T, Revill P, Sculpher M. A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z. PMID: 37041590; PMCID: PMC10088659.
    12. Uzochukwu BSC, Okeke C, O'Brien N, Ruiz F, Sombie I, Hollingworth S. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria. Global Health. 2020 Jul 8;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00583-2. PMID: 32641066; PMCID: PMC7346669.
    13. Kim T, Sharma M, Teerawattananon Y, Oh C, Ong L, Hangoma P, Adhikari D, Pempa P, Kairu A, Orangi S, Dabak SV. Addressing Challenges in Health Technology Assessment Institutionalization for Furtherance of Universal Health Coverage Through South-South Knowledge Exchange: Lessons From Bhutan, Kenya, Thailand, and Zambia. Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PMID: 33838558; PMCID: PMC8163602.
    14. Surgey G, Chalkidou K, Reuben W, Suleman F, Miot J, Hofman K. Introducing health technology assessment in Tanzania. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):80-86. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000588. Epub 2019 Aug 12. PMID: 31402790.
    15. Addo R, Hall J, Haas M, Goodall S. The knowledge and attitude of Ghanaian decision-makers and researchers towards health technology assessment. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Apr;250:112889. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112889. Epub 2020 Feb 29. PMID: 32146238.
    16. Mayora C, Kazibwe J, Ssempala R, Nakimuli B, Ssennyonjo A, Ekirapa E, Byakika S, Aliti T, Musila T, Gad M, Vassall A, Ruiz F, Ssengooba F. Health technology assessment (HTA) readiness in Uganda: stakeholder's perceptions on the potential application of HTA to support national universal health coverage efforts. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Oct 31;39(1):e65. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002635. PMID: 37905441; PMCID: PMC11579667.
    17. Kaló Z, Gheorghe A, Huic M, Csanádi M, Kristensen FB. HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries. Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):179-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.3298. Epub 2016 Jan 14. PMID: 26763688; PMCID: PMC5066682.
    18. Chalkidou K, Glassman A, Marten R, Vega J, Teerawattananon Y, Tritasavit N, Gyansa-Lutterodt M, Seiter A, Kieny MP, Hofman K, Culyer AJ. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):462-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.155721. Epub 2016 Feb 12. PMID: 27274598; PMCID: PMC4890204.
    19. Wilkinson T, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Revill P, Briggs A, Cairns JA, Teerawattananon Y, Asfaw E, Lopert R, Culyer AJ, Walker DG. The International Decision Support Initiative Reference Case for Economic Evaluation: An Aid to Thought. Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015. PMID: 27987641.
    20. Drummond MF, Augustovski F, Bhattacharyya D, Campbell J, Chaiyakunapruk N, Chen Y, Galindo-Suarez RM, Guerino J, Mejía A, Mujoomdar M, Ollendorf D, Ronquest N, Torbica A, Tsiao E, Watkins J, Yeung K; ISPOR HTA Council Working Group on HTA in Pluralistic Healthcare Systems collaborators. Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Pluralistic Healthcare Systems: An ISPOR Council Report. Value Health. 2022 Aug;25(8):1257-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.006. Erratum in: Value Health. 2023 Dec;26(12):1811. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.010. PMID: 35931428.
    21. MacQuilkan K, Baker P, Downey L, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, Prinja S, Zhao K, Wilkinson T, Glassman A, Hofman K. Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1527556. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1527556. PMID: 30326795; PMCID: PMC6197020.
    22. Pitt C, Vassall A, Teerawattananon Y, Griffiths UK, Guinness L, Walker D, Foster N, Hanson K. Foreword: Health Economic Evaluations in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Methodological Issues and Challenges for Priority Setting. Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/hec.3319. PMID: 26804357; PMCID: PMC5066637.
    23. Filby A, McConville F, Portela A. What Prevents Quality Midwifery Care? A Systematic Mapping of Barriers in Low and Middle Income Countries from the Provider Perspective. PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0153391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153391. PMID: 27135248; PMCID: PMC4852911.
    24. Oortwijn W, Sampietro-Colom L, Habens F, Trowman R. HOW CAN HEALTH SYSTEMS PREPARE FOR NEW AND EMERGING HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES? THE ROLE OF HORIZON SCANNING REVISITED. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):254-259. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000363. Epub 2018 Jun 11. PMID: 29888687.
    25. Nemzoff C, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, Mehndiratta A, Guinness L, Cluzeau F, Shah H. Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e004549. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004549. PMID: 33903175; PMCID: PMC8076924.
    26. Orem JN, Mafigiri DK, Nabudere H, Criel B. Improving knowledge translation in Uganda: more needs to be done. Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3482. PMID: 24624247; PMCID: PMC3946259.

Why publish with us?

  • Global Visibility – Indexed in major databases

  • Fast Peer Review – Decision within 14–21 days

  • Open Access – Maximize readership and citation

  • Multidisciplinary Scope – Biology, Medicine and Engineering

  • Editorial Board Excellence – Global experts involved

  • University Library Indexing – Via OCLC

  • Permanent Archiving – CrossRef DOI

  • APC – Affordable APCs with discounts

  • Citation – High Citation Potential

Submit Your Article

Advertisement