googlescholar-adv.jpg
55 of 82
Qualitative Model of Electrical Conductivity of Irradiated Semiconductor
Temur Pagava, Levan Chkhartishvili, Manana Beridze, Darejan Khocholava, Marina Shogiradze and Ramaz Esiava
Abstract

Abstract at IgMin Research

Our mission is to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and accelerate the advancement of knowledge across a wide spectrum of scientific domains.

Application of Virtual Reality (VR) in Facility Management Competency-based Training (CBT) in the Era of Industrie 5.0

Affiliation

Affiliation

    School of Science and Technology, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore

Abstract

This case study investigates the implementation of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in facilities management Competency-Based Training (CBT) within one of Singapore’s leading facilities and township management companies. Traditionally, workplace training in facility management has relied heavily on lecture-based methods, often resulting in insufficient preparation and a high turnover rate among newly onboarded staff. To address this challenge, this study explores the conversion of training materials into VR-based courseware, enabling immersive and interactive learning experiences.
Two groups of newly onboarded staff underwent either traditional lecture-based or VR training sessions. Results indicate that those trained using VR exhibited a better comprehension of the material and higher levels of motivation compared to their counterparts in the traditional lecture-based group. However, it was noted that VR training carries the risk of cybersickness, with some participants reporting symptoms such as dizziness. To mitigate this issue, insights from existing literature on cybersickness are incorporated to enhance future VR training materials.
This paper studies the application of VR in Facilities Management Competency-based training within the discourse of Industrie 5.0, the latest evolution of industrial technology that emphasizes human-machine collaboration and smart technologies such as VR. By leveraging VR technology for training purposes, this initiative aligns with the principles of Industrie 5.0, fostering innovation and efficiency in facility management practices. Overall, this research underscores the potential of VR in revolutionizing training methodologies within the practices of facilities management while addressing associated challenges to ensure optimal learning outcomes.

Figures

References

    1. Bereiter C. Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's world 3. Educational researcher. 1994; 23: 7; 21-23.
    2. Bruner JS. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review. 1961; 31; 21-32.
    3. Piaget J. The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press. 1980; 23–34.
    4. Bada SO, Olusegun S. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2015; 5:6; 66-70
    5. Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. In Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 1997; 6: 4; 355-385.
    6. Milgram P, Kishino F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems. 1994; 77:12; 1321-1329.
    7. Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S. Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society. 2014; 17:4; 133–149.
    8. Radu I. Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2014; 18:6; 1533-1543.
    9. Altinpulluk H. Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies. 2019; 24:2; 1089-1114.
    10. Jesionkowska J, Wild F, Deval Y. Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education - A case study. Education Sciences.2020; 10:
    11. Bower M, Jong MSY. Immersive virtual reality in education. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2020; 51:6; 1981-1990.
    12. Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education. 2013; 62:41-49.
    13. Lemole GM Jr, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery. 2007 Jul;61(1):142-8; discussion 148-9. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000279734.22931.21. PMID: 17621029.
    14. Andersen D, Popescu V, Cabrera ME, Shanghavi A, Gomez G, Marley S, Mullis B, Wachs JP. Medical telementoring using an augmented reality transparent display. Surgery. 2016 Jun;159(6):1646-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 21. PMID: 26804823.
    15. Boud AC, Haniff DJ, Baber C, Steiner SJ. Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. In 1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization. 1999; 32-36.
    16. Reinhart G, Patron C. Integrating augmented reality in the assembly domain-fundamentals, benefits and applications. CIRP Annals. 2003; 52:1; 5-8.
    17. Henderson SJ, Feiner S. Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret. In 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 2009; 135-144.
    18. Gavish N, Gutiérrez T, Webel S, Rodríguez J, Peveri M, Bockholt U, Tecchia F. Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments. 2015; 23:6; 778-798.
    19. BMW Group. Absolutely real: Virtual and augmented reality open new avenues in the BMW Group Production System, Munich. 2019. Accessed 8 January 2021. https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T0294345EN/absolutely-real:-virtual-and-augmented-reality-open-new-avenues-in-the-bmw-group-production-system?language=en
    20. Capuano N, Gaeta A, Guarino G, Miranda S, Tomasiello S. Enhancing augmented reality with cognitive and knowledge perspectives: a case study in museum exhibitions. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2016; 35:11; 968-979.
    21. Hou L, Wang Y, Wang X, Maynard N, Cameron IT, Zhang S, Jiao Y. Combining photogrammetry and augmented reality towards an integrated facility management system for the oil industry. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2014; 102:2; 204-220.
    22. Baek F, Ha I, Kim H. Augmented reality system for facility management using image-based indoor localization. Automation in Construction. 2019; 99:18-26.
    23. Tay TF. Augmented reality push among tech initiatives to help tourism businesses transform. The Straits Times. 2020. Accessed 8 January 2021. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/augmented-reality-push-among-tech-initiatives-to-help-tourism-businesses-transform
    24. Stoltz MH, Giannikas V, McFarlane D, Strachan J, Um J, Srinivasan R. Augmented reality in warehouse operations: opportunities and barriers. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017; 50:1; 12979-12984.
    25. International Facility Management Association. What is Facility Management? International Facility Management Association. 2020. Accessed 8 January 2021. https://www.ifma.org/about/what-is-facility-management
    26. Ministry of Manpower. Requirements for safe management measures at the workplace, Singapore. 2020. Accessed 8 January 2021. https://www.mom.gov.sg/covid-19/requirements-for-safe-management-measures
    27. Peter B, Hofman WHA. Perceived Effects of Competency-Based Training on the 980 Acquisition of Professional Skills. International Journal of Educational Development. 2014; 36:81-981 89.
    28. Lombardo FE, Jacks LJ. Competency-Based Training for Air Traffic Control Specialists. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2002; 12(3):291-307. DOI: 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1203_6
    29. Huang HM, Liaw SS. An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2018;19: 1; 91-115.
    30. Wang M, Callaghan V, Bernhardt J, White K, Peña-Rios A. Augmented reality in education and training: pedagogical approaches and illustrative case studies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2018; 9:5; 1391-1402.
    31. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1993; 3: 3; 203-220.
    32. LaViola JJ. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM Sigchi Bulletin. 2000; 32:1; 47-56.
    33. Kolasinski EM. Technical Report 1027: Simulator sickness in virtual environments.US Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences. 1995.
    34. Howarth PA, Costello PJ. The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system.  1997; 18:2; 107-116.
    35. Cobb SV, Nichols S, Ramsey A, Wilson JR. Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 1999; 8: 2; 169-186.
    36. Davis S, Nesbitt K, Nalivaiko E. Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the Oculus Rift and two virtual roller coasters. In Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment. 2015; 27:3-14
    37. Rebenitsch L, Owen C. Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2014; 309-317.
    38. Rebenitsch L. Managing cybersickness in virtual reality. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students. 2015; 22: 1; 46-51.
    39. LaViola JJ, Jr, McMahan RP. A survey of methods for reducing cybersickness. In Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE. 2017; 619-620.
    40. Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-Heuser B, Wang L. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 – inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2021; 61:530-535.
    41. Adel A. Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. J Cloud Comput (Heidelb). 2022;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8. PMID: 36101900; PMCID: PMC9454409.
    42. Maddikunta P, Pham Q, Prabadevi B, Deepa N, Dev K, Gadekallu T, Rukhasana R, Liyanage M. Industry 5.0: a survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022.
    43. Ernst and Young. Study on the Built Environment Workforce in Singapore. Job Transformation Map for the BE Sector Public Report.

Similar Articles

Challenge and Readiness to Implemented Geothermal Energy in Indonesia
Endah Murtiana Sari, Kalyca Najla Manggala, Marvian Farabi Arief and Panduaji Suswanto Umar Said
DOI10.61927/igmin178
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Ovarian Cancer: A Case Report
Andrea González De Godos, Enrique Asensio Diaz, Pilar Pinto Fuentes, Baltasar Pérez Saborido and David Pacheco Sánchez
DOI10.61927/igmin181